Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;22(3):251-62.
doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2015.0401. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

Looking Ahead to Engineering Epimorphic Regeneration of a Human Digit or Limb

Affiliations
Review

Looking Ahead to Engineering Epimorphic Regeneration of a Human Digit or Limb

Lina M Quijano et al. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Approximately 2 million people have had limb amputations in the United States due to disease or injury, with more than 185,000 new amputations every year. The ability to promote epimorphic regeneration, or the regrowth of a biologically based digit or limb, would radically change the prognosis for amputees. This ambitious goal includes the regrowth of a large number of tissues that need to be properly assembled and patterned to create a fully functional structure. We have yet to even identify, let alone address, all the obstacles along the extended progression that limit epimorphic regeneration in humans. This review aims to present introductory fundamentals in epimorphic regeneration to facilitate design and conduct of research from a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine perspective. We describe the clinical scenario of human digit healing, featuring published reports of regenerative potential. We then broadly delineate the processes of epimorphic regeneration in nonmammalian systems and describe a few mammalian regeneration models. We give particular focus to the murine digit tip, which allows for comparative studies of regeneration-competent and regeneration-incompetent outcomes in the same animal. Finally, we describe a few forward-thinking opportunities for promoting epimorphic regeneration in humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
The process of amphibian epimorphic regeneration. An intact limb consists of tissues of various types, including dermal, skeletal, neural, and vascular. After amputation, the wound heals to form an epidermal layer, the underlying tissues undergo matrix remodeling, and cells in the region secrete soluble factors. A heterogeneous cell mass, or blastema, forms from the proliferation and migration of cells from the adjacent tissues. The blastema then gives rise to the various new tissues that are spatially patterned to reconstruct the original limb structure. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/teb
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Regeneration in the murine digit model. Epimorphic regeneration in the murine digit is level-specific and provides an opportunity for comparative studies of mammalian epimorphic regeneration. Transection through the P2 element results in the frequent outcome of fibrotic scar tissue formation. Transection through the more distal P3 element instead results in the regeneration of missing tissue. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/teb
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
Opportunities for engineering epimorphic regeneration. Epimorphic regeneration has been observed in distal finger tips of children and young adults. Converting such stochastic events into designed clinical outcomes will require altering the default postamputation progression. Engineering the epimorphic regeneration process may include the transplantation of cells, scaffolds, and/or soluble factors, as well as controlling microenvironmental aspects, such as oxygen concentration, tissue hydration, mechanical, and electrical cues. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/teb

References

    1. Ziegler-Graham K., MacKenzie E.J., Ephraim P.L., Travison T.G., and Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89, 422, 2008 - PubMed
    1. Owings M.F., and Kozak L.J. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Stat 13, 1, 1998 - PubMed
    1. Tintle S.M., Forsberg J.A., Keeling J.J., Shawen S.B., and Potter B.K. Lower extremity combat-related amputations. J Surg Orthop Adv 19, 35, 2010 - PubMed
    1. Antfolk C., D'Alonzo M., Rosen B., Lundborg G., Sebelius F., and Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices 10, 45, 2013 - PubMed
    1. Muneoka K., Allan C.H., Yang X., Lee J., and Han M. Mammalian regeneration and regenerative medicine. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 84, 265, 2008 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources