Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;47(1):180-6.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke

Affiliations

An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke

Joel Salinas et al. Stroke. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Value-based health care aims to bring together patients and health systems to maximize the ratio of quality over cost. To enable assessment of healthcare value in stroke management, an international standard set of patient-centered stroke outcome measures was defined for use in a variety of healthcare settings.

Methods: A modified Delphi process was implemented with an international expert panel representing patients, advocates, and clinical specialists in stroke outcomes, stroke registers, global health, epidemiology, and rehabilitation to reach consensus on the preferred outcome measures, included populations, and baseline risk adjustment variables.

Results: Patients presenting to a hospital with ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were selected as the target population for these recommendations, with the inclusion of transient ischemic attacks optional. Outcome categories recommended for assessment were survival and disease control, acute complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes proposed for assessment at 90 days were pain, mood, feeding, selfcare, mobility, communication, cognitive functioning, social participation, ability to return to usual activities, and health-related quality of life, with mobility, feeding, selfcare, and communication also collected at discharge. One instrument was able to collect most patient-reported subdomains (9/16, 56%). Minimum data collection for risk adjustment included patient demographics, premorbid functioning, stroke type and severity, vascular and systemic risk factors, and specific treatment/care-related factors.

Conclusions: A consensus stroke measure Standard Set was developed as a simple, pragmatic method to increase the value of stroke care. The set should be validated in practice when used for monitoring and comparisons across different care settings.

Keywords: outcome; outcome and process assessment; patient-centered outcomes research; quality improvement; stroke; stroke care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Timeline of data collection.

Comment in

References

    1. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) and the GBD Stroke Experts Group. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Bus Rev. 2013;91:50–70.
    1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–2481. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. - PubMed
    1. Solomon NA, Glick HA, Russo CJ, Lee J, Schulman KA. Patient preferences for stroke outcomes. Stroke. 1994;25:1721–1725. - PubMed
    1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Group, Oxford: Report to the Department of Health. A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures in relation to stroke. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Group web site. http://phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk/pdf/PROMs_Oxford_Stroke_17092010.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2014.

Publication types