Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr:39:1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 21.

Immune suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment

Affiliations
Review

Immune suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment

David H Munn et al. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Effective immunotherapy, whether by checkpoint blockade or adoptive cell therapy, is limited in most patients by a key barrier: the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Suppression of tumor-specific T cells is orchestrated by the activity of a variety of stromal myeloid and lymphoid cells. These often display inducible suppressive mechanisms that are triggered by the same anti-tumor inflammatory response that the immunotherapy intends to create. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of how the immunosuppressive milieu develops and persists is critical in order to harness the full power of immunotherapy of cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of constitutive and inducible suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment
T cells attempting to activate in the tumor microenvironment may face constitutive expression of PD-L1 and IDO by the tumor cells. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the tumor may produce immunosuppressive nitric oxide (NO), arginase-I or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Tumor-associated macrophages may produce TGFβ and VEGF, which can be inhibitory for both T cells and dendritic cells. Activated Tregs can produce IL-10 and TGFβ, which may directly suppress T cells. Tregs may also inhibit expression of costimulatory ligands CD80 and CD86 on local DCs, thus rendering them ineffective and tolerizing antigen-presenting cells. As effector T cells attempt to activate, their production of IFNγ and other pro-inflammatory cytokines may actively up-regulate expression of IDO and PD-L1 by DCs, thus eliciting counter-regulatory suppression. Many tumor cells may also respond to IFNγ by up-regulating IDO and PD-L1.

References

    1. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1974–1982. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, Yuan J, Zaretsky JM, Desrichard A, Walsh LA, Postow MA, Wong P, Ho TS, et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2189–2199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Allen EM, Miao D, Schilling B, Shukla SA, Blank C, Zimmer L, Sucker A, Hillen U, Geukes Foppen MH, Goldinger SM, et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science. 2015;350:207–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kvistborg P, Philips D, Kelderman S, Hageman L, Ottensmeier C, Joseph-Pietras D, Welters MJ, van der Burg S, Kapiteijn E, Michielin O, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:254ra128. This study shows that CTLA-4 blockade can allow T cell responses to new tumor-associated antigens (suggesting improved cross-presentation of endogenous tumor antigens), and that these antigens are not confined only to unique mutational neoantigens, but can also be tumor-associated shared-self antigens. - PubMed

Publication types