Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;146(12):895-903.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.017.

Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Valeria V Gordan, Joseph L Riley 3rd, D Brad Rindal, Vibeke Qvist, Jeffrey L Fellows, Deborah A Dilbone, Solomon G Brotman, Gregg H Gilbert; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Valeria V Gordan et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: A prospective cohort study that included dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network was conducted to quantify 12-month failures of restorations that were repaired or replaced at baseline. The study tested the hypothesis that no significant differences exist in failure percentages between repaired and replaced restorations after 12 months. It also tested the hypothesis that certain dentist, patient, and restoration characteristics are significantly associated with the incidence of restoration failure.

Methods: Dentists recorded data for 50 or more consecutive defective restorations. The restorations that were either repaired or replaced were recalled after 12 months and characterized for developing defects.

Results: Dentists (N = 195) recorded data on 5,889 restorations; 378 restorations required additional treatment (74 repaired, 171 replaced, 84 teeth received endodontic treatment, and 49 were extracted). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that additional treatment was more likely to occur if the original restoration had been repaired (7%) compared with replaced (5%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.1), if a molar was restored (7%) compared with premolars or anterior teeth (5% and 6%, respectively) (OR, 1.4; P = .010; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), and if the primary reason was a fracture (8%) compared with other reasons (6%) (OR, 1.3; P = .033; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6).

Conclusions: An additional treatment was more likely to occur within the first year if the original restoration had been repaired (7%) compared with being replaced (5%). However, repaired restorations were less likely to need an aggressive treatment (replacement, endodontic treatment, or extraction) than replaced restorations.

Practical implications: One year after repair or replacement of a defective restoration, the failure rate was low. However, repaired restorations were less likely to need an aggressive treatment than replaced restorations.

Keywords: Longevity; cohort; decision; defective; practice-based research; repair; replacement; restorations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tveit AB, Espelid I. Class II amalgams: interobserver variations in replacement decisions and diagnosis of caries and crevices. Int Dent J. 1992;42(1):12–18. - PubMed
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Agreement among dentists’ recommendations for restorative treatment. J Dent Res. 1993;72(5):891–896. - PubMed
    1. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508. - PubMed
    1. Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, Shen C, Yang M, Mjör IA. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Oper Dent. 2004;29(4):392–397. - PubMed
    1. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28:87–101. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms