Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement
- PMID: 26611902
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3879-y
Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement
Abstract
Purpose: Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was introduced to address some of the problems that can occur following cemented UKR. The aim of this study was to report the 5-year experience of the first 512 medial cementless Oxford UKR implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications.
Methods: The first consecutive 512 cementless Phase 3 Oxford UKRs implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications between June 2004 and October 2013 were prospectively identified and followed up independently. All the procedures were carried out through a minimally invasive approach without eversion or dislocation of the patella. Patients were assessed clinically pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery with functional outcome scores and radiographs.
Results: There were eight reoperations of which six were revisions giving a 5-year survival of 98 % (95 % CI 94-100 %). At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (1.0-10.2), the mean OKS was 43 (SD 7), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 13), and AKSS (functional) was 86 (SD 17). The first 120 cases had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean 5.9; range 5-10.2). In these patients, the mean OKS was 41 (SD 8), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 14), and AKSS (functional) was 82 (SD 18). There were no femoral radiolucencies and no complete tibial radiolucencies. 11 % of tibial components had partial radiolucent lines; the remaining 89 % had no radiolucencies.
Conclusion: The clinical results are as good as or better than those previously reported for cemented fixation. The radiographic results are better with secure bony attachment to the implants in every case.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Cementless fixation; Functional outcome; Implant survival; Unicompartmental knee replacement.
Similar articles
-
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39294529
-
Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05544-w. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31209540 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.Knee. 2021 Jan;28:383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.003. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Knee. 2021. PMID: 33408039 Clinical Trial.
-
Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first 1000 cases.Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1231-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 24. Knee. 2018. PMID: 30150067
-
Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct;29(10):3229-3245. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06091-5. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021. PMID: 32613336
Cited by
-
Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3. Epub 2016 May 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27161197
-
Long-term in vivo wear of different bearing types used for the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.Bone Joint Res. 2019 Dec 3;8(11):535-543. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.811.BJR-2019-0163.R1. eCollection 2019 Nov. Bone Joint Res. 2019. PMID: 31832173 Free PMC article.
-
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Jun 6;3(6):363-373. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170048. eCollection 2018 Jun. EFORT Open Rev. 2018. PMID: 30034817 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-operative predictive factors of residual varus on the mechanical axis after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 9;9:1054351. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1054351. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36700020 Free PMC article.
-
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39294529
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials