Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 30:2:8.
doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0019-1. eCollection 2015.

The European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery (EUREQUO): a database study of trends in volumes, surgical techniques and outcomes of refractive surgery

Affiliations

The European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery (EUREQUO): a database study of trends in volumes, surgical techniques and outcomes of refractive surgery

Mats Lundström et al. Eye Vis (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: A European web-based registry for refractive surgery was established in 2008; The European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO). The aim of the registry was to improve treatment and standards of care for refractive surgery. Further aims were to offer a tool for benchmarking by establishing a reference database and for surgeons to enter and analyze their own outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize the registry and analyze the data collected during its first decade.

Methods: The characteristics of the web-based registry are described. Data collected from February 4(th) 2004 until June 30(th) 2014 are included in the analysis. The database is analyzed in terms of surgical technique, indications for surgery, complications, and refractive and visual outcomes.

Results: Data have been reported from 47 centers in 14 countries until mid-2014. About 4,000 procedures were reported annually. The most frequent procedure was laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with 11697 reported surgeries. Over time in the database, LASIK declined (p < 0.001) while photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) increased (p < 0.001 for both procedures). The indications for surgery, in terms of preoperative refraction and age, were stable over time, for all types of procedures. Surgical complications were reported infrequently and with a well-known relationship to the type of surgical procedure. The reported refractive outcomes were good. The visual outcomes indicate a significant increase of visual acuity after high myopia treatment by phakic intraocular lens in the anterior (phakic IOL AC) and the posterior (phakic IOL PC) chamber and a poorer visual outcome, after both myopia and hyperopia treatment, by epithelial LASIK (Epi-LASIK).

Conclusions: We describe the establishment of a European registry for refractive surgery. The database increases at a rate of approximately 4000 refractive procedures per year. The most frequent procedure is LASIK, but both PRK and RLE are an increasing part of the reported procedures. The indications for surgery have been stable over time. Surgical complications and visual outcome vary, depending on the type of surgery.

Keywords: European database; Outcomes; Refractive surgery; Registry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Web form for entering surgical data. This form is for preoperative data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standard graphs showing the surgical outcomes for one clinic or surgeon. The upper left graph shows attempted refraction versus achieved refraction in Diopters. The upper right graph shows postoperative defocus of equivalent refraction in Diopters. The lower left graph shows the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction. The lower mid graph shows the preoperative spectacle corrected visual acuity versus the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity. Both bar rows show the accumulated frequency of visual acuity. The lower right graph shows the visual outcome in terms of loss of one Snellen line or more, status quo or gain of one Snellen line or more.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surface diagram showing database trend of reported type of surgical procedure. The diagram does not include the first two years because of the limited number of cases and clinics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Terzi E, Kern T, Kohnen T. [Complications after refractive surgery abroad] [Article in German] Ophthalmologe. 2008;105:474–9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-007-1635-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lockington D, Johnson R, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Healthcare and a holiday: the risks of LASIK tourism. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97:370–2. - PubMed
    1. Limburg H, Foster S, Gilbert C, Johnson GJ, Kyndt M, Myatt M. Routine monitoring of visual outcome of cataract surgery. Part 2: Results from eight study centers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:50–2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.045369. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lundström M, Barry P, Brocato L, Fitzpatrick C, Henry Y, Rosen P, et al. European registry for quality improvement in cataract surgery. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27:140–51. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2012-0101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lundström M, Barry P, Henry Y, Rosen P, Stenevi U. Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery. Guidelines based on data in the EUREQUO database. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1086–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources