Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 26614882
- PMCID: PMC4730956
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.014
Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Image sharing technologies may reduce unneeded imaging by improving provider access to imaging information. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the impact of image sharing technologies on patient imaging utilization.
Methods: Quantitative evaluations of the effects of PACS, regional image exchange networks, interoperable electronic heath records, tools for importing physical media, and health information exchange systems on utilization were identified through a systematic review of the published and gray English-language literature (2004-2014). Outcomes, standard effect sizes (ESs), settings, technology, populations, and risk of bias were abstracted from each study. The impact of image sharing technologies was summarized with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression models.
Results: A total of 17 articles were included in the review, with a total of 42 different studies. Image sharing technology was associated with a significant decrease in repeat imaging (pooled effect size [ES] = -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-0.25, -0.09]; P < .001). However, image sharing technology was associated with a significant increase in any imaging utilization (pooled ES = 0.20; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.32]; P = .002). For all outcomes combined, image sharing technology was not associated with utilization. Most studies were at risk for bias.
Conclusions: Image sharing technology was associated with reductions in repeat and unnecessary imaging, in both the overall literature and the most-rigorous studies. Stronger evidence is needed to further explore the role of specific technologies and their potential impact on various modalities, patient populations, and settings.
Keywords: Health information exchange; data sharing; evaluation; radiology information systems; utilization.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The other authors have no conflicts of interest related to the material discussed in this article.
Figures


References
-
- Stevenson CA. Problems in radiology of today and the future. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1966;98:777–781. - PubMed
-
- White K, Berbaum K, Smith WL. The role of previous radiographs and reports in the interpretation of current radiographs. Invest Radiol. 1994;29:263–265. - PubMed
-
- Reiner BI. Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 3: reconciliation of historical and current radiology report data. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:768–771. - PubMed
-
- Sung JC, Sodickson A, Ledbetter S. Outside CT imaging among emergency department transfer patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:626–632. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources