Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1419-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.001.

Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina

Louise M Henderson, Mary W Marsh, Thad Benefield, Elizabeth Pearsall, Danielle Durham, Bruce F Schroeder, J Michael Bowling, Cheryl A Viglione, Bonnie C Yankaskas

Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina

Louise M Henderson et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Mammography technologists' level of training, years of experience, and feedback on technique may play an important role in the breast-cancer screening process. However, information on the mammography technologist workforce is scant.

Methods: In 2013, we conducted a survey mailed to 912 mammography technologists working in 224 facilities certified by the Mammography Quality Standards Act in North Carolina. Using standard survey methodology, we developed and implemented a questionnaire on the education and training, work experiences, and workplace interactions of mammography technologists. We aggregated responses using survey weights to account for nonresponse. We describe and compare lead (administrative responsibilities) and nonlead (supervised by another technologist) mammography technologist characteristics, testing for differences, using t-tests and χ(2) analysis.

Results: A total of 433 mammography technologists responded (survey response rate = 47.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.2%-50.7%), including 128 lead and 305 nonlead technologists. Most mammography technologists were non-Hispanic, white women; their average age was 48 years. Approximately 93% of lead and nonlead technologists had mammography-specific training, but <4% had sonography certification, and 3% had MRI certification. Lead technologists reported more years of experience performing screening mammography (P = .02) and film mammography (P = .03), more administrative hours (P < .0001), and more workplace autonomy (P = .002) than nonlead technologists. Nonlead technologists were more likely to report performing diagnostic mammograms (P = .0004) or other breast imaging (P = .001), discuss image quality with a peer (P = .013), and have frequent face-to-face interaction with radiologists (P = .03).

Conclusions: Our findings offer insights into mammography technologists' training and work experiences, highlighting variability in characteristics of lead versus nonlead technologists.

Keywords: Mammography; technologist; variability; workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Schroeder is a paid consultant for GE Healthcare and is a stockholder for Matakina, Inc. and Koning Corporation.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed April 15, 2015];Mammography Quality Standards Act National Statistics. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandard....
    1. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996;156(2):209–13. - PubMed
    1. Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology. 2009;253(3):641–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Howard DH. Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience? Journal of Women's Health / the official publication of the Society for the Advancement of Women's Health Research. 1998;7(4):443–9. - PubMed
    1. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94(5):369–75. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms