Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 13:6:987.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00987. eCollection 2015.

Plant Innate Immunity Multicomponent Model

Affiliations

Plant Innate Immunity Multicomponent Model

Giuseppe Andolfo et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Our understanding of plant-pathogen interactions is making rapid advances in order to address issues of global importance such as improving agricultural productivity and sustainable food security. Innate immunity has evolved in plants, resulting in a wide diversity of defense mechanisms adapted to specific threats. The postulated PTI/ETI model describes two perception layers of plant innate immune system, which belong to a first immunity component of defense response activation. To better describe the sophisticated defense system of plants, we propose a new model of plant immunity. This model considers the plant's ability to distinguish the feeding behavior of their many foes, such as a second component that modulates innate immunity. This hypothesis provides a new viewpoint highlighting the relevance of hormone crosstalk and primary metabolism in regulating plant defense against the different behaviors of pathogens with the intention to stimulate further interest in this research area.

Keywords: IAC; IMC; biotrophic; necrotrophic; phytohormone; plant defense; primary metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Two different resistance directions are supposed to be activated in a multi-trophic interaction. Once a plant containing a R-gene (different green shades) comes in contact with biotrophic or necrotrophic pathogens, only an incompatible interaction will activate the plant resistance. In this scheme, the interaction spaces of plant resistance (green triangle) and of biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens (blue and red rectangles, respectively), are indicated. The intersections of interaction spaces identify three plant–pathogen interaction areas: two are pathogen lifestyle-related (small black triangles) and one is common (violet circle). The synergic effect of immunity activation and of pathogen lifestyle-dependent components result in plant immunity to biotrophic or necrotrophic pathogens.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The circular model. The model schematically shows the key points of activation and modulation of plant immunity. Plant resistance mechanism of an incompatible interaction might be divided into three phases: (1) interaction, (2) activation/modulation, and (3) effective resistance (immunity). During the interaction stage, two principal effects are detected: (A) modifications of virulence factor targets and (B) specific alterations of primary plant metabolism. In the activation stage: the modifications of virulence factor targets induce the Nibblers Triggered Signaling (NTS) or PPRs Triggered Signaling (PTS), mediated by R-genes activation. These metabolic alterations induce a feedback regulation of primary metabolic pathways resulting in a Hormone Tempered Resistance (HTR). In the effective resistance stage, the NTS/PTS, and the HTR converge to confer a resistance specific to the lifestyle of pathogen (Pathogen lifestyle-Specific Resistance, PSR).

References

    1. Andolfo G., Ferriello F., Tardella L., Ferrarini A., Sigillo L., Frusciante L., et al. (2014). Tomato genome-wide transcriptional responses to Fusarium wilt, and tomato Mosaic virus. PLoS ONE 9:e94963 10.1371/journal.pone.0094963 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asselbergh B., De Vleesschauwer D., Hofte M. (2008). Global switches and fine-tuning: ABA modulates plant pathogen defence. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21 709–719. 10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0709 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Audenaert K., De Meyer G. B., HöFte M. M. (2002). Abscisic acid determines basal susceptibility of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and Sugars and suppresses salicylic acid-dependent signaling mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 128 491–501. 10.1104/pp.010605 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balmer D., Flors V., Glauser G., Mauch-Mani B. (2013). Metabolomics of cereals under biotic stress: current knowledge and techniques. Front. Plant Sci. 4:82 10.3389/fpls.2013.00082 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bari R., Jones J. D. (2009). Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 69 473–488. 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources