Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;31(4):351-68.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0104-8. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases

Affiliations
Review

Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases

Lamberto Manzoli et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse events, either serious or mild/moderate, of all generic versus brand-name cardiovascular medicines. We searched randomized trials in MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trial Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov (last update December 1, 2014). Attempts were made to contact the investigators of all potentially eligible trials. Two investigators independently extracted and analyzed soft (including systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and others) and hard efficacy outcomes (including major cardiovascular adverse events and death), minor/moderate and serious adverse events. We included 74 randomized trials; 53 reported ≥1 efficacy outcome (overall sample 3051), 32 measured mild/moderate adverse events (n = 2407), and 51 evaluated serious adverse events (n = 2892). We included trials assessing ACE inhibitors (n = 12), anticoagulants (n = 5), antiplatelet agents (n = 17), beta-blockers (n = 11), calcium channel blockers (n = 7); diuretics (n = 13); statins (n = 6); and others (n = 3). For both soft and hard efficacy outcomes, 100 % of the trials showed non-significant differences between generic and brand-name drugs. The aggregate effect size was 0.01 (95 % CI -0.05; 0.08) for soft outcomes; -0.06 (-0.71; 0.59) for hard outcomes. All but two trials showed non-significant differences in mild/moderate adverse events, and aggregate effect size was 0.07 (-0.06; 0.20). Comparable results were observed for each drug class and in each stratified meta-analysis. Overall, 8 serious possibly drug-related adverse events were reported: 5/2074 subjects on generics; 3/2076 subjects on brand-name drugs (OR 1.69; 95 % CI 0.40-7.20). This meta-analysis strengthens the evidence for clinical equivalence between brand-name and generic cardiovascular drugs. Physicians could be reassured about prescribing generic cardiovascular drugs, and health care organization about endorsing their wider use.

Keywords: Brand-name drug; Cardiovascular diseases; Efficacy; Generic drug; Meta-analysis; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Meta-analysis evaluating the clinical efficacy (soft outcomes) of generic vs brand-name drugs against cardiovascular diseases
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analysis evaluating the clinical efficacy (hard outcomes: MACE or death) of generic versus brand-name drugs against cardiovascular diseases
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis evaluating the risk of mild or moderate adverse events of generic versus brand-name drugs against cardiovascular diseases

References

    1. Dentali F, Donadini MP, Clark N, Crowther MA, Garcia D, Hylek E, et al. Brand name versus generic warfarin: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(4):386–393. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.4.386. - DOI - PubMed
    1. OECD . OECD. Health at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013. p. 2013.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Generic drugs: questions and answers. US Food and Drug Administration. 2013. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/QuestionsAnswers/ucm1.... Accessed November 2014.
    1. Kesselheim AS, Misono AS, Lee JL, Stedman MR, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK, et al. Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(21):2514–2526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.758. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kesselheim AS, Stedman MR, Bubrick EJ, Gagne JJ, Misono AS, Lee JL, et al. Seizure outcomes following the use of generic versus brand-name antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs. 2010;70(5):605–621. doi: 10.2165/10898530-000000000-00000. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms