Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;17(2):377-89.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv048. Epub 2015 Nov 29.

Spatial measurement error and correction by spatial SIMEX in linear regression models when using predicted air pollution exposures

Stacey E Alexeeff  1 , Raymond J Carroll  2 , Brent Coull  3
Affiliations

Spatial measurement error and correction by spatial SIMEX in linear regression models when using predicted air pollution exposures

Stacey E Alexeeff et al. Biostatistics. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Spatial modeling of air pollution exposures is widespread in air pollution epidemiology research as a way to improve exposure assessment. However, there are key sources of exposure model uncertainty when air pollution is modeled, including estimation error and model misspecification. We examine the use of predicted air pollution levels in linear health effect models under a measurement error framework. For the prediction of air pollution exposures, we consider a universal Kriging framework, which may include land-use regression terms in the mean function and a spatial covariance structure for the residuals. We derive the bias induced by estimation error and by model misspecification in the exposure model, and we find that a misspecified exposure model can induce asymptotic bias in the effect estimate of air pollution on health. We propose a new spatial simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) procedure, and we demonstrate that the procedure has good performance in correcting this asymptotic bias. We illustrate spatial SIMEX in a study of air pollution and birthweight in Massachusetts.

Keywords: Air pollution; Birthweight; Environmental epidemiology; Kriging; Model uncertainty; Spatial model.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexeeff S. E., Schwartz J., Kloog I., Chudnovsky A., Koutrakis P., Coull B. A. (2014). Consequences of Kriging and land use regression for PM2.5 predictions in epidemiologic analyses: insights into spatial variability using high-resolution satellite data. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell M. L., Ebisu K., Belanger K. (2007). Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in connecticut and massachusetts. Environmental Health Perspectives 115, 1118–1124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergen S., Sheppard L., Sampson P. D., Kim S. Y., Richards M., Vedal S., Kaufman J. D., Szpiro A. A. (2013). A national prediction model for PM2.5 component exposures and measurement error-corrected health effect inference. Environmental Health Perspectives 121, 1017–1025. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brauer M., Hoek G., van Vliet P., Meliefste K., Fischer P., Gehring U., Heinrich J., Cyrys J., Bellander T., Lewne M.. and others (2003). Estimating long-term average particulate air pollution concentrations: application of traffic indicators and geographic information systems. Epidemiology 14(2), 228–239. - PubMed
    1. Brook R. D., Rajagopalan S., Pope C. A. III, Brook J. R., Bhatnagar A., Diez-Roux A. V., Holguin F., Hong Y., Luepker R. V., Mittleman M. A.. and others (2010). A.H.A. scientific statement. particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 121, 2331–2378. - PubMed

Publication types