Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 24:3:e1438.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.1438. eCollection 2015.

Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities

Affiliations

Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities

Ramal Moonesinghe et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Monitoring national trends in disparities in different diseases could provide measures to evaluate the impact of intervention programs designed to reduce health disparities. In the US, most of the reports that track health disparities provided either relative or absolute disparities or both. However, these two measures of disparities are not only different in scale and magnitude but also the temporal changes in the magnitudes of these measures can occur in opposite directions. The trends for absolute disparity and relative disparity could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease in the two populations being compared either increase or decline simultaneously. If the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for consecutive time periods, the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for the combined time periods even with a larger increase in absolute disparity during the combined time periods. Based on random increases or decreases in prevalence of disease for two population groups, there is a higher chance the trends of these two measures could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease for the more advantaged group is very small relative to the prevalence of disease for the more disadvantaged group. When prevalence of disease increase or decrease simultaneously for two populations, the increase or decrease in absolute disparity has to be sufficiently large enough to warrant a corresponding increase or decrease in relative disparity. When absolute disparity declines but relative disparity increases, there is some progress in reducing disparities, but the reduction in absolute disparity is not large enough to also reduce relative disparity. When evaluating interventions to reduce health disparities using these two measures, it is important to consider both absolute and relative disparities and consider all the scenarios discussed in this paper to assess the progress towards reducing or eliminating health disparities.

Keywords: Absolute disparity; Health disparities; Relative disparity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. (A) Infant deaths per 1,000 live births from 1950 to 1991 in Black and White populations. (B) The black–white absolute disparity and relative disparity in infant deaths from 1950 to 1991.

References

    1. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality National healthcare disparities report. 2013. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr13/2013nhdr.pdf (accessed 7 July 2015)
    1. Andrulis DP, Siddiqui NJ, Purtle JP, Duchon L. Patient protection and affordable care act of 2010: advancing health equity for racially and ethnically diverse populations. Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. Available at http://jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/Patient%20Protection%20and%20... (accessed 7 July 2015)
    1. Asada Y. On the choice of absolute or relative inequality measures. Milbank Quarterly. 2010;88:616–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00614.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhopal RS. Re: “an overview of methods for monitoring social disparities in cancer with an example using trends in lung cancer incidence by area-socioeconomic position and race-ethnicity, 1992–2004”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;167:1214–1216. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC Health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2013. MMWR Supplement Vol. 62/ No. 3. 2013. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf (accessed 7 July 2015) - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources