Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):200-6.
doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.167096.

An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Sikkim

Supratim Datta  1 , Shramana Sengupta  2
Affiliations

An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Sikkim

Supratim Datta et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Aim: Spontaneous voluntary adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is paramount to the success of the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. There has however been minimal and sporadic voluntary reporting of ADR's at the ADR Monitoring Centre (AMC) Gangtok, Sikkim. Knowledge, perception, attitude, and awareness of health professionals are determinants of reporting practices. This questionnaire study aims at evaluating these indicators in the teaching hospital attached to the Medical Institute and find out methods to improve existing reporting practices.

Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based observational study carried out in the Medical, Surgical and Pathology Departments of the Teaching Hospital, Gangtok, Sikkim over a period of 2 months. The questionnaires were filled by the respondents and returned back to us within the next 24 h. Data obtained from filled questionnaires were thereby analyzed.

Results: The overall correct response rate to the knowledge-based questions was 56.3%. While 97% of respondents were of the view that ADR reporting was necessary, 35% of the respondents felt that the difficulty in deciding the causality of an ADR discouraged them from reporting. 79% of the respondents were not aware of the presence of an AMC affiliated to the hospital, and 87% of the respondents admitted that they were not sending filled ADR forms to the AMC.

Conclusions: The study indicates that the respondents have an average knowledge and positive attitude toward ADR reporting and pharmacovigilance. There is however a lack of awareness and poor ADR reporting practices. Efforts are required to enhance awareness and attitude toward pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction monitoring; Pharmacovigilance Programme of India; attitude and practice study; knowledge; pharmacovigilance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Biswas P. Pharmacovigilance in Asia. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4:S7–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. International Drug Monitoring. The Role of National Centers. Report of a WHO Meeting. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1972;498:1–25. - PubMed
    1. Importance of ADR reporting in India. [Last accessed on 2014 Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.pharmacovigilance.co.in .
    1. Ramesh M, Pandit J, Parthasarathi G. Adverse drug reactions in a south Indian hospital – Their severity and cost involved. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12:687–92. - PubMed
    1. Arulmani R, Rajendran SD, Suresh B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65:210–6. - PMC - PubMed