Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;41(3):182-91.
doi: 10.1503/jpn.140384.

Facial emotion processing in patients with social anxiety disorder and Williams-Beuren syndrome: an fMRI study

Affiliations

Facial emotion processing in patients with social anxiety disorder and Williams-Beuren syndrome: an fMRI study

Cynthia Binelli et al. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) and Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) are 2 conditions with major differences in terms of genetics, development and cognitive profiles. Both conditions are associated with compromised abilities in overlapping areas, including social approach, processing of social emotional cues and gaze behaviour, and to some extent they are associated with opposite behaviours in these domains. We examined common and distinct patterns of brain activation during a facial emotion processing paradigm in patients with SAD and WBS.

Methods: We examined patients with SAD and WBS and healthy controls matched by age and laterality using functional MRI during the processing of happy, fearful and angry faces.

Results: We included 20 patients with SAD and 20 with WBS as well as 20 matched controls in our study. Patients with SAD and WBS did not differ in the pattern of limbic activation. We observed differences in early visual areas of the face processing network in patients with WBS and differences in the cortical prefrontal regions involved in the top-down regulation of anxiety and in the fusiform gyrus for patients with SAD. Compared with those in the SAD and control groups, participants in the WBS group did not activate the right lateral inferior occipital cortex. In addition, compared with controls, patients with WBS hypoactivated the posterior primary visual cortex and showed significantly less deactivation in the right temporal operculum. Participants in the SAD group showed decreased prefrontal activation compared with those in the WBS and control groups. In addition, compared with controls, participants with SAD showed decreased fusiform activation. Participants with SAD and WBS also differed in the pattern of activation in the superior temporal gyrus, a region that has been linked to gaze processing.

Limitations: The results observed in the WBS group are limited by the IQ of the WBS sample; however, the specificity of findings suggests that the pattern of brain activation observed for WBS is more likely to reflect a neurobiological substrate rather than intellectual impairment per se.

Conclusion: Patients with SAD and WBS showed common and specific patterns of brain activation. Our results highlight the role of cortical regions during facial emotion processing in individuals with SAD and WBS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Differential activation between groups in response to matching emotional faces and the control shape condition (all faces v. shapes). (A) Between-group differences for matching emotional faces (all faces) compared with the control shape condition. (B) Within-group map showing significant activation for the Williams–Beuren syndrome (WBS) group for the same contrast. The blue circle reflects the lateral occipital area, with no activation in the WBS group. HC = healthy controls; SAD = social anxiety disorder.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differential activation between groups in response to matching emotional faces and the control shape condition (all faces v. shapes). Between-group analysis maps show differences in brain activation in response to matching emotional faces (all faces) and the control shape condition. HC = healthy control; SAD = social anxiety disorder; WBS = Williams–Beuren syndrome.

References

    1. Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, et al. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21:169–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Pérez Jurado AL. Williams-Beuren syndrome: a model of recurrent genomic mutation. Horm Res. 2003;59:106–13. - PubMed
    1. Järvinen A, Korenberg JR, Bellugi U. The social phenotype of Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:414–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle TF, Bellugi U, Korenberg JR, et al. “Everybody in the world is my friend” hypersociability in young children with Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A:263–73. - PubMed

Publication types