Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):14693-700.
eCollection 2015.

The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis

Affiliations

The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis

Du He et al. Int J Clin Exp Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT)/radical surgery treatment (RST) with RST alone in patients with cervical cancer were eligible for inclusion.

Results: Eight studies were finally included in this meta analysis, involving a total of 1302 patients. Meta analysis shows that NACT might have lower lymph node metastasis than RST [OR=0.57, 95% CI (0.41, 0.79), P=0.0008]. However, there are no differentiation between two groups in operation time [SMD=0.16, 95% CI (-0.08, 0.48), P=0.19], intraoperative estimated blood loss [SMD=0.20, 95% CI (-0.19, 0.58), P=0.48], intraoperative and postoperative complication rates [OR=1.33, 95% CI (0.45, 3.92), P=0.60], overall survival rate [OR=1.07, 95% CI (0.48, 2.41), P=0.86] and recurrence rate [OR=1.06, 95% CI (0.56, 2.03), P=0.85].

Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of two treatments are similarly. However, NACT can reduce the rate of lymph node metastasis, which is an independent risk factor for cervical cancer prognosis and may improve the prognosis of cervical cancer.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; NACT; RST; meta analysis; preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical surgery treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the document screening process and results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The risk of bias of all the included studies the percentage of project judging.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias: authors of all included studies each project risk of bias in judgment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of overall survival rates between NACT group and RST group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of the rate of lymph node metastasis between NACT group and RST Group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot for checking publication bias.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of operation time between NACT group and RST group.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Comparison of the estimated intraoperative blood loss between NACT group and RST group.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison of the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates between NACT group and RST group.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Comparison of recurrence rate between NACT group and RST group.

References

    1. Rettenmaier MA, Casanova DM, Micha JP, Moran MF, Ramsanghani NS, Syed NA, Puthawala A, DiSaia PJ. Radical hysterectomy and tailored postoperative radiation therapy in the management of bulky stage 1B cervical cancer. Cancer. 1989;63:2220–3. - PubMed
    1. Piver MS, Chung WS. Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;46:507–10. - PubMed
    1. Eifel PJ, Morris M, Wharton JT, Oswald MJ. The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Kanayama N, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Baek S, Chatani M, Kotsuma T, Tanaka E, Yoshida K, Seo Y, Suzuki O, Mabuchi S, Shiki Y, Tatsumi K, Kimura T, Teshima T, Ogawa K. Definitive radiotherapy for primary vaginal cancer: correlation between treatment patterns and recurrence rate. J Radiat Res. 2015;56:346–53. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources