Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0144125.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144125. eCollection 2015.

Associated Factors and Consequences of Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Yoga: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Associated Factors and Consequences of Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Yoga: A Systematic Review

Holger Cramer et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of complementary therapy interventions seems to be associated with specific factors and to potentially distort the studies' conclusions. This systematic review assessed associated factors of risk of bias and consequences for the studies' conclusions in RCTs of yoga as one of the most commonly used complementary therapies.

Methods: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, IndMED and the Cochrane Library were searched through February 2014 for yoga RCTs. Risk of selection bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and regressed to a) publication year; b) country of origin; c) journal type; and d) impact factor using multiple logistic regression analysis. Likewise, the authors' conclusions were regressed to risk of bias.

Results: A total of 312 RCTs were included. Impact factor ranged from 0.0 to 39.2 (median = 1.3); 60 RCT (19.2%) had a low risk of selection bias, and 252 (80.8%) had a high or unclear risk of selection bias. Only publication year and impact factor significantly predicted low risk of bias; RCTs published after 2001 (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 12.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7, 94.0; p<0.001) and those published in journals with impact factor (adjusted OR = 2.6; 95%CI = 1.4, 4.9; p = 0.004) were more likely to have low risk of bias. The authors' conclusions were not associated with risk of bias.

Conclusions: Risk of selection bias was generally high in RCTs of yoga; although the situation has improved since the publication of the revised CONSORT statement 2001. Pre-CONSORT RCTs and those published in journals without impact factor should be handled with increased care; although risk of bias is unlikely to distort the RCTs' conclusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Results of the literature search.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Associations of risk of selection bias and publication year in randomized controlled trials of yoga.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Associations of risk of selection bias and impact factor in randomized controlled trials of yoga.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feuerstein G (1998) The yoga tradition. Prescott: Hohm Press.
    1. De Michelis E (2005) A History of modern yoga: Patanjali and Western esotericism. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    1. Cramer H, Ward L, Steel A, Lauche R, Dobos G, Zhang Y (2015) Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of yoga use: Results of a US nationally representative survey. Am J Prev Med. - PubMed
    1. Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL (2015) Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. Natl Health Stat Report: 1–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G (2014) Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of yoga: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med 14: 328 10.1186/1472-6882-14-328 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources