Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 6;12(113):20150803.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0803.

Grand challenges in space synthetic biology

Affiliations
Review

Grand challenges in space synthetic biology

Amor A Menezes et al. J R Soc Interface. .

Abstract

Space synthetic biology is a branch of biotechnology dedicated to engineering biological systems for space exploration, industry and science. There is significant public and private interest in designing robust and reliable organisms that can assist on long-duration astronaut missions. Recent work has also demonstrated that such synthetic biology is a feasible payload minimization and life support approach as well. This article identifies the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in the field of space synthetic biology, while highlighting relevant progress. It also outlines anticipated broader benefits from this field, because space engineering advances will drive technological innovation on Earth.

Keywords: life support; manufacturing; resource utilization; space cybernetics; space medicine; terraforming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The six grand challenges of space synthetic biology (art by Hugo Teixeira).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Synthetic biological control systems for use in space. (a) A traditional feedback control system consists of a controller, an actuator, a sensor and a system to be controlled, all arranged within a feedback loop. (b) ‘Biology-in-the-loop’ control refers to contemporary electromechanical (e.g. microfluidic or optical) techniques of externally controlling a biological system. (c) Challenge 5 moves towards a methodology that completely integrates biological controllers (perhaps based on gene regulatory networks), actuators (perhaps one or more proteins) and sensors (perhaps levels of chemicals of interest) with the biological system to be controlled (the control subchallenge). (d) Challenge 5 also includes the case where biological controllers and the systems to be controlled constitute separate biological subsystems that individually interact with abiotic sensors and actuators, all of which are part of a larger system, e.g. a hybrid robot (the artificial life subchallenge).

References

    1. Menezes AA, Cumbers J, Hogan JA, Arkin AP. 2015. Towards synthetic biological approaches to resource utilization on space missions. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20140715 (10.1098/rsif.2014.0715) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horneck G. 2008. The microbial case for Mars and its implication for human expeditions to Mars. Acta Astronaut. 63, 1015–1024. (10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.12.002) - DOI
    1. De Vera J-P. 2012. Lichens as survivors in space and on Mars. Fungal Ecol. 5, 472–479. (10.1016/j.funeco.2012.01.008) - DOI
    1. Venkateswaran K, La Duc MT, Horneck G. 2014. Microbial existence in controlled habitats and their resistance to space conditions. Microb. Environ. 29, 243–249. (10.1264/jsme2.ME14032) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oren A. 2014. Halophilic archaea on Earth and in space: growth and survival under extreme conditions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140194 (10.1098/rsta.2014.0194) - DOI - PubMed