Robust estimation of the proportion of treatment effect explained by surrogate marker information
- PMID: 26631934
- PMCID: PMC4826843
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.6820
Robust estimation of the proportion of treatment effect explained by surrogate marker information
Abstract
In randomized treatment studies where the primary outcome requires long follow-up of patients and/or expensive or invasive obtainment procedures, the availability of a surrogate marker that could be used to estimate the treatment effect and could potentially be observed earlier than the primary outcome would allow researchers to make conclusions regarding the treatment effect with less required follow-up time and resources. The Prentice criterion for a valid surrogate marker requires that a test for treatment effect on the surrogate marker also be a valid test for treatment effect on the primary outcome of interest. Based on this criterion, methods have been developed to define and estimate the proportion of treatment effect on the primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. These methods aim to identify useful statistical surrogates that capture a large proportion of the treatment effect. However, current methods to estimate this proportion usually require restrictive model assumptions that may not hold in practice and thus may lead to biased estimates of this quantity. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric procedure to estimate the proportion of treatment effect on the primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on a potential surrogate marker and extend this procedure to a setting with multiple surrogate markers. We compare our approach with previously proposed model-based approaches and propose a variance estimation procedure based on a perturbation-resampling method. Simulation studies demonstrate that the procedure performs well in finite samples and outperforms model-based procedures when the specified models are not correct. We illustrate our proposed procedure using a data set from a randomized study investigating a group-mediated cognitive behavioral intervention for peripheral artery disease participants.
Keywords: kernel estimation; nonparametric; robust; surrogate marker; treatment effect.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
-
- Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemiö K, Hämäläinen H, Härkönen P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the finnish diabetes prevention study. The Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1673–1679. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69701-8. - PubMed
-
- Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, Li H, Li H, Jiang Y, An Y, et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the china da qing diabetes prevention study: a 20-year follow-up study. The Lancet. 2008;371(9626):1783–1789. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60766-7. - PubMed
-
- Wittes J, Lakatos E, Probstfield J. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: cardiovascular diseases. Statistics in Medicine. 1989;8(4):415–425. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080405. - PubMed
-
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [October 1, 2013];advances and emerging opportunities in diabetes research: a strategic planning report of the Diabetes Mellitus Interagency Coordinating Committee. http://www2.niddk.nih.gov/AboutNIDDK/ReportsAndStrategicPlanning/Diabete....
-
- Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Statistics in medicine. 1989;8(4):431–440. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080407. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources