Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;94(48):e2178.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002178.

STROBE--Radiation Ulcer: An Overlooked Complication of Fluoroscopic Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

STROBE--Radiation Ulcer: An Overlooked Complication of Fluoroscopic Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study

Kai-Che Wei et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec.

Abstract

With increasing numbers of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and complex cardiac procedures, higher accumulated radiation dose in patient has been observed. We speculate cardiac catheter intervention induced radiation skin damage is no longer rare.To study the incidence of cardiac fluoroscopic intervention induced radiation ulcer. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of those who received cardiac fluoroscopic intervention in our hospital during 2012 to 2013 for any events of radiation ulcer. Only patients, whose clinical photos were available for reviewing, would be included for further evaluation. The diagnosis of radiation ulcers were made when there is a history of PCI with pictures proven skin ulcers, which presented typical characteristics of radiation injury. Nine patients with radiation ulcer were identified and the incidence was 0.34% (9/2570) per practice and 0.42% (9/2124) per patient. Prolonged procedure time, cumulative multiple procedures, right coronary artery occlusion with chronic total occlusion, obesity, and diabetes are frequent characteristics. The onset interval between the first skin manifestation and the latest radiation exposure varied from 3 weeks to 3 months. The histopathology studies failed to make diagnosis correctly in 5 out of 6 patients. To make thing worse, skin biopsy exacerbated the preexisting radiation dermatitis. Notably, all radiation ulcers were refractory to conventional wound care. Surgical intervention was necessary to heal the wound. Diagnosis of cardiac fluoroscopy intervention induced radiation skin damage is challenging and needs high index of clinical suspicion. Minimizing the radiation exposure by using new approaches is the most important way to prevent this complication. Patient education and a routine postprocedure dermatology follow up are mandatory in high-risk groups for both radiation skin damage and malignancies. This is a retrospective study, thus the true incidence of radiation ulcer caused by cardiac fluoroscopic intervention could be higher.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Typical presentation of cardiac fluoroscopy-induced radiation dermatitis before ulceration. An 81-year-old man presented with a painful sharply demarcated concentric target-like patch. A central erosion with a peripheral white sclerotic zone and an outer hyperpigmented “flame burn-like” zone.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Radiation dermatitis mimicking contact dermatitis. An 82-year-old man presented with an itchy painful sharply demarcated rectangular erythematous patch with dry fish scale-like desquamation on right subscapula, auxiliary and inner arm. The initial clinical diagnosis was contact dermatitis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Radiation dermatitis mimicking scleroderma. A 62-year-old man presented an itchy painful bizarre-shaped atrophic telangiectatic plaque with a central small ulcer and heterogeneous color change on his mid back.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
A fully developed cardiac fluoroscopy-induced radiation ulcer. A 60-year-old man had a painful deep large ulcer surrounded by a well-demarcated sclerotic dyspigmented patch on right subscapular and arm for 2 months.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Histopathology of cardiac fluoroscopy induced skin damage. (A) Histopathology showed a patchy lymphatic infiltration and dilated vessels in the superficial dermis. In the mid and lower dermis, there is a sclerotic background composed of haphazardly arranged thick collagen fibers, absence of adnexal structures, and scattered atypical fibroblasts in the reticular dermis. These features are consistent with the diagnosis of radiation dermatitis. However, scleroderma may present the similar changes. (B) Nevertheless, the atypical fibroblasts (arrow) were conspicuously seen in some foci. That was the feature of radiation skin damage, not of scleroderma.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Outcome of surgical intervention for cardiac fluoroscopy-induced radiation ulcer. A 52-year-old man had radical excision of radiation ulcer and reconstruction of rotation flap. One month after the operation, good healing was noted.

References

    1. Aerts A, Decraene T, van den Oord JJ, et al. Chronic radiodermatitis following percutaneous coronary interventions: a report of two cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2003; 17:340–343. - PubMed
    1. Herz-Ruelas ME, Gomez-Flores M, Moxica-Del Angel J, et al. Ulcerated radiodermatitis induced after fluoroscopically guided stent implantation angioplasty. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2014; 2014:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khouzam RN, Soufi MK, Nakhla R, et al. Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention: has its time come? J Invasive Cardiol 2014; 26:E167–E169. - PubMed
    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015; 131:e29–e322. - PubMed
    1. Brilakis E. Manual of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: A Step-by-Step Approach. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2013.