Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox
- PMID: 26635232
- PMCID: PMC4687563
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518936112
Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply to Albers: Acceptance of empirical evidence for gender disparities in Dutch research funding.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):E6830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521336112. Epub 2015 Dec 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26635231 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112. Epub 2015 Sep 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26392544 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Simpson EH. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc, B. 1951;13:238–241.
-
- Bickel PJ, Hammel EA, O’Connell JWO. Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from berkeley. Science. 1975;187(4175):398–404. - PubMed
-
- Albers CJ. NWO, Gender Bias and Simpson's Paradox. 2015. Available at blog.casperalbers.nl/science/nwo-gender-bias-and-simpsons-paradox/. Accessed November 23, 2015. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
