Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov 25:2:62.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00062. eCollection 2015.

Dynamic Knee Alignment and Collateral Knee Laxity and Its Variations in Normal Humans

Kamal Deep  1 , Frederic Picard  2 , Jon V Clarke  2
Affiliations
Review

Dynamic Knee Alignment and Collateral Knee Laxity and Its Variations in Normal Humans

Kamal Deep et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Alignment of normal, arthritic, and replaced human knees is a much debated subject as is the collateral ligamentous laxity. Traditional quantitative values have been challenged. Methods used to measure these are also not without flaws. Authors review the recent literature and a novel method of measurement of these values has been included. This method includes use of computer navigation technique in clinic setting for assessment of the normal or affected knee before the surgery. Computer navigation has been known for achievement of alignment accuracy during knee surgery. Now its use in clinic setting has added to the inventory of measurement methods. Authors dispel the common myth of straight mechanical axis in normal knees and also look at quantification of amount of collateral knee laxity. Based on the scientific studies, it has been shown that the mean alignment is in varus in normal knees. It changes from lying non-weight-bearing position to standing weight-bearing position in both coronal and the sagittal planes. It also varies with gender and race. The collateral laxity is also different for males and females. Further studies are needed to define the ideal alignment and collateral laxity which the surgeon should aim for individual knees.

Keywords: alignment; computer navigation; knee joint; ligament laxity; measurement; normal human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The method of alignment measurement on plain radiographs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The computer screen representation of leg alignment in coronal and sagittal planes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MAR. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop (1983) 173:178. - PubMed
    1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Post-operative alignment of total knee replacements: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop (1994) 299:153. - PubMed
    1. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 404:7. - PubMed
    1. Hovinga KR, Lerner AL. Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res (2009) 27(9):1191–6.10.1002/jor.20858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and the radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee (2003) 10:55.10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00050-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources