Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;100(7):3301-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7155-3. Epub 2015 Dec 5.

Microbial analysis of in situ biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems: implications for monitoring and control of drinking water quality

Affiliations

Microbial analysis of in situ biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems: implications for monitoring and control of drinking water quality

Isabel Douterelo et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) is influenced by the source water, the supply infrastructure and the operation of the system. A holistic approach was used to advance knowledge on the development of mixed species biofilms in situ, by using biofilm sampling devices installed in chlorinated networks. Key physico-chemical parameters and conventional microbial indicators for drinking water quality were analysed. Biofilm coverage on pipes was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The microbial community structure, bacteria and fungi, of water and biofilms was assessed using pyrosequencing. Conventional wisdom leads to an expectation for less microbial diversity in groundwater supplied systems. However, the analysis of bulk water showed higher microbial diversity in groundwater site samples compared with the surface water site. Conversely, higher diversity and richness were detected in biofilms from the surface water site. The average biofilm coverage was similar among sites. Disinfection residual and other key variables were similar between the two sites, other than nitrates, alkalinity and the hydraulic conditions which were extremely low at the groundwater site. Thus, the unexpected result of an exceptionally low diversity with few dominant genera (Pseudomonas and Basidiobolus) in groundwater biofilm samples, despite the more diverse community in the bulk water, is attributed to the low-flow hydraulic conditions. This finding evidences that the local environmental conditions are shaping biofilm formation, composition and amount, and hence managing these is critical for the best operation of DWDS to safeguard water quality.

Keywords: Bacteria; Biofilms; Drinking water distribution systems; Fungi.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Biofilm sampling device installed within a pipe section at one of the sampling sites. b Insertion of modified PWG coupons for in situ analysis of biofilms in the sampling device and coupon showing the curved profile designed to minimise disruption of boundary layer effects. c Coupon with two inserts designed for microscopy analysis and two identical outer areas for biofilm removal and subsequent DNA extraction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Top: Area distribution plots showing cell coverage on biofilms estimated by CLSM analysis. Bottom: SEM micrographs of biofilm grown on modified PWG coupons: a surface water and b groundwater
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relative abundance at class level of a bacteria and b fungi in biofilm and bulk water samples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heat maps showing the percentages of the most abundant bacteria and fungi at genus level within bulk water and biofilm samples (n = 3). a Bacteria and b fungi
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Rarefaction curves at 97 % of sequence similarity for water and biofilm samples. Rarefaction curves were obtained for Chao1 index richness estimator and Shannon diversity estimator. a Bacteria; b fungi. In the legend: B = biofilm, W = water, and the numbers indicate the biological replicate

References

    1. Abu-Ashour JJ, Lee D, Whiteley H, Zelin S. Transport of microorganisms through soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1994;75:141–158. doi: 10.1007/BF01100406. - DOI
    1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:143–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bik HM, Porazinska DL, Creer S, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Thomas WK. Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27:233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brinkman NE, Haugland RA, Wymer LJ, Byappanahalli M, Whitman RL, Vesper SJ. Evaluation of a rapid, quantitative real-time PCR method for enumeration of pathogenic Candida cells in water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1775–1782. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1775-1782.2003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callaway TR, Dowd SE, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Krueger N, Bauer N, Kononoff PJ, Nisbet DJ. Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the rumen and feces of cattle fed different levels of dried distillers grains plus solubles using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3977–3983. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2900. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types