Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Dec 5:16:554.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1082-6.

The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The significant increase in the average life expectancy has increased the societal challenge of managing serious age-related diseases, especially cancer and cardiovascular diseases. A routine check by a general practitioner is not sufficient to detect incipient cardiovascular disease.

Design: Population-based randomized clinically controlled screening trial.

Participants: 45,000 Danish men aged 65-74 years living on the Island of Funen, or in the surrounding communities of Vejle and Silkeborg. No exclusion criteria are used.

Interventions: One-third will be invited to cardiovascular seven-faceted screening examinations at one of four locations. The screening will include: (1) low-dose non-contrast CT scan to detect coronary artery calcification and aortic/iliac aneurysms, (2) brachial and ankle blood pressure index to detect peripheral arterial disease and hypertension, (3) a telemetric assessment of the heart rhythm, and (4) a measurement of the cholesterol and plasma glucose levels. Up-to-date cardiovascular preventive treatment is recommended in case of positive findings.

Objective: To investigate whether advanced cardiovascular screening will prevent death and cardiovascular events, and whether the possible health benefits are cost effective.

Outcome: Registry-based follow-up on all cause death (primary outcome), and costs after 3, 5 and 10 years (secondary outcome).

Randomization: Each of the 45,000 individuals is, by EPIDATA, given a random number from 1-100. Those numbered 67+ will be offered screening; the others will act as a control group.

Blinding: Only those randomized to the screening will be invited to the examination;the remaining participants will not. Numbers randomized: A total of 45,000 men will be randomized 1:2. Recruitment: Enrollment started October 2014.

Outcome: A 5% reduction in overall mortality (HR=0.95), with the risk for a type 1 error=5% and the risk for a type II error=80%, is expected. We expect a 2-year enrollment, a 10-year follow-up, and a median survival of 15 years among the controls. The attendance to screening is assumed to be 70%.

Discussion: The primary aim of this so far stand-alone population-based, randomized trial will be to evaluate the health benefits and costeffectiveness of using non-contrast full truncus computer tomography (CT) scans (to measure coronary artery calcification (CAC) and identify aortic/iliac aneurysms) and measurements of the ankle brachial blood pressure index (ABI) as part of a multifocal screening and intervention program for CVD in men aged 65-74. Attendance rate and compliance to initiated preventive actions must be expected to become of major importance.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN12157806 (21 March 2015).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Expected flow chart of the men included in the DANCAVAS trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Algorithm after attending screening. Supplemental algorithm for aneurysms; see Table 1

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hjertestatistik 2013. http://www.hjerteforeningen.dk/film_og_boeger/udgivelser/hjertestatistik/.
    1. Sillesen H, Falk E. Why not screen for subclinical atherosclerosis? Lancet. 2011;378(9792):645–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60059-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polonsky TS, Greenland P. CVD screening in low-risk, asymptomatic adults: clinical trials needed. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9(10):599–604. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindholt JS, Sorensen J, Sogaard R, Henneberg EW. Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2010;97(6):826–34. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources