Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Continuous Femoral Nerve Block in Pain Relief After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 26639986
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.030
Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Continuous Femoral Nerve Block in Pain Relief After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Although both local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) are common analgesic modalities for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we are aware of no parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that has solely compared the efficacy of LIA and continuous FNB.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving patients scheduled for TKA. A total of 45 patients were randomly assigned to either the LIA or the continuous FNB group. Except for the analgesic modality, perioperative managements were identical in both groups. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest 1 day after surgery, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale.
Results: Patients in the LIA group had a significantly lower visual analog scale score at rest 1 day after surgery than those in the continuous FNB group (34 ± 10 vs 42 ± 13 mm; P = .028). The opioid consumption during the initial 24 hours was significantly lower in the LIA group (12 ± 4 vs 16 ± 7 mg; P = .031). There were no differences in the rate of complications between the groups.
Conclusion: LIA was associated with better pain relief with a comparable complications rate for patients undergoing TKA than FNB. We recommend LIA for pain relief after TKA.
Keywords: knee; pain management; periarticular injection; peripheral nerve blockade; total knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Comparing Local Infiltration and Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Relief After Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):1133-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Feb 4. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26899476 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):1134-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Feb 4. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26923494 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
