Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 27:6:1807.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01807. eCollection 2015.

A Cognitive Profile of Obesity and Its Translation into New Interventions

Affiliations

A Cognitive Profile of Obesity and Its Translation into New Interventions

Anita Jansen et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Change your lifestyle: decrease your energy intake and increase your energy expenditure, is what obesity experts tell people who need to lose weight. Though the advice might be correct, it appears to be extremely difficult to change one's lifestyle. Unhealthy habits usually are ingrained and hard to change, especially for people with an "obese cognitive profile." Knowledge of the cognitive mechanisms that maintain unhealthy eating habits is necessary for the development of interventions that can change behavior effectively. This paper discusses some cognitive processes that might maintain unhealthy eating habits and make healthier eating difficult, like increased food cue reactivity, weak executive skills and attention bias. An effort is also done to translate these basic scientific findings into new interventions which aim to tackle the sabotaging cognitive processes. Preliminary studies into the effectiveness of these interventions, if available, are presented.

Keywords: attention bias; cue reactivity; executive functions; extinction; immediate reward; inhibition; obesity; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The obese cognitive profile. Some cognitive mechanisms (in red) maintaining overeating and matched intervention modules (in green) to tackle the sabotaging cognitive processes. For the sake of simplicity arrows are only drawn between the specific process and the matched training module. Reality probably is more complex: the cognitive processes are interrelated and might influence each other (e.g., weak executive skills and drive for immediate rewards might increase food cue reactivity) and a specific training module might not only influence the specific process but also have an effect on other cognitive processes (e.g., extinction training might reduce biased attention and disinhibition).

References

    1. Allom V., Mullan B. (2015). Two inhibitory control training interventions designed to improve eating behaviour and determine mechanisms of change. Appetite 89, 282–290. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appelhans B. M. (2009). Neurobehavioral inhibition of reward-driven feeding: implications for dieting and obesity. Obesity 17, 640–647. 10.1038/oby.2008.638 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appelhans B. M., French S. A., Pagoto S. L., Sherwood N. E. (2016). Managing temptation in obesity treatment: a neurobehavioral model of intervention strategies. Appetite 96, 268–279. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.035 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atance C. M., O’Neill D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 533–539. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D. (1986). Working Memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

LinkOut - more resources