Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 May;41(9):E535-40.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001320.

Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Transoral Approach to the Cervical Spine

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Transoral Approach to the Cervical Spine

Jeremy Steinberger et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May.

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data.

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing transoral approach using a large national database.

Summary of background data: The transoral approach to the anterior skull base and atlanto-axial cervical spine provides a direct corridor to the lower clivus, C1, C2, and occasionally C3. Due to the rarity of this approach and the unfamiliar anatomy, there is potential for significant morbidity and mortality.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing transoral approach to the cervical spine from 2008 to 2012 were identified by the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 22548 in the ACS NSQIP database. Cases with missing preoperative information were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess associated morbidity and mortality.

Results: One hundred twenty-six patients underwent cervical spine and clival surgery via the transoral approach. There were a total of 27 (21.4%) postoperative complications with three (2.4%) mortalities. On multivariate analysis, there was an increased risk of complications with operative time >4 hours [odds ratio (OR) 7.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.8-33.1, P = 0.0054] and total length of stay >5 days (OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.4-23.4, P = 0.0006).

Conclusion: The transoral approach carries significant risks of morbidity and mortality. Maintaining operative time <4 hours and LOS <5 days may decrease morbidity and mortality.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types