Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jun;24(6):2445-53.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3044-7. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial

Claire Foster  1 , Chloe Grimmett  2 , Christine M May  2 , Sean Ewings  3 , Michelle Myall  2 , Claire Hulme  4 , Peter W Smith  3 , Cassandra Powers  2 , Lynn Calman  2 , Jo Armes  5 , Matthew Breckons  6 , Jessica Corner  7 , Deborah Fenlon  7 , Lynn Batehup  7 , Elaine Lennan  8 , Carl R May  7 , Carolyn Morris  9 , Amanda Neylon  10 , Emma Ream  11 , Lesley Turner  9 , Lucy Yardley  12 , Alison Richardson  7   8
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial

Claire Foster et al. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a frequent and distressing symptom experienced after cancer treatment. RESTORE is the first web-based resource designed to enhance self-efficacy to manage CRF following curative-intent treatment. The aim of this study is to test the proof of concept and inform the design of an effectiveness trial.

Methods: A multi-centre parallel-group two-armed (1:1) exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative process evaluation was employed in the study. Participants (≥18 years; ≤5 years post treatment with moderate to severe fatigue) were recruited and randomly assigned to RESTORE or a leaflet. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, completion of outcome measures and process evaluation. Change in self-efficacy to manage CRF was also explored. Outcome measures were completed at baseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1) and 12 weeks (T2). Data were analysed using mixed-effects linear regression and directed content analysis.

Results: One hundred and sixty-three people participated in the trial and 19 in the process evaluation. The intervention was feasible (39 % of eligible patients consented) and acceptable (attrition rate 36 %). There was evidence of higher fatigue self-efficacy at T1 in the intervention group vs comparator (mean difference 0.51 [-0.08 to 1.11]), though the difference in groups decreased by 12 weeks. Time since diagnosis influenced perceived usefulness of the intervention. Modifications were suggested.

Conclusion: Proof of concept was achieved. The RESTORE intervention should be subject to a definitive trial with some adjustments. Provision of an effective supportive resource would empower cancer survivors to manage CRF after treatment completion.

Trial registration: ISRCTN67521059.

Keywords: Cancer; Fatigue; Intervention; Self-management; Web-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research . Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.
    1. Foster C, et al. Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2009;18(3):223–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01001.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richards M, Corner J, Maher J. The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative: new and emerging evidence on the ongoing needs of cancer survivors. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Suppl 1):S1–S4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richardson A. Fatigue in cancer patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care. 1995;4:20–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00049.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown LF, Kroenke K. Cancer-related fatigue and its associations with depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(5):440–447. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70835-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types