Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 8:5:17988.
doi: 10.1038/srep17988.

Microplastics profile along the Rhine River

Thomas Mani  1 , Armin Hauk  2 , Ulrich Walter  2 , Patricia Burkhardt-Holm  1   3
Affiliations

Microplastics profile along the Rhine River

Thomas Mani et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Microplastics result from fragmentation of plastic debris or are released to the environment as pre-production pellets or components of consumer and industrial products. In the oceans, they contribute to the 'great garbage patches'. They are ingested by many organisms, from protozoa to baleen whales, and pose a threat to the aquatic fauna. Although as much as 80% of marine debris originates from land, little attention was given to the role of rivers as debris pathways to the sea. Worldwide, not a single great river has yet been studied for the surface microplastics load over its length. We report the abundance and composition of microplastics at the surface of the Rhine, one of the largest European rivers. Measurements were made at 11 locations over a stretch of 820 km. Microplastics were found in all samples, with 892,777 particles km (-2) on average. In the Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan area, a peak concentration of 3.9 million particles km (-2) was measured. Microplastics concentrations were diverse along and across the river, reflecting various sources and sinks such as waste water treatment plants, tributaries and weirs. Measures should be implemented to avoid and reduce the pollution with anthropogenic litter in aquatic ecosystems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of microplastic particles (300 μm−5 mm) 1000 m−3 in categories at all sampling sites (Δ).
The horizontal columns present microplastic abundance 1000 m−3 and the respective fraction of categories. L: left bank, M: mid-river, R: right bank, T: transect (position in the river cross section). The figure was created using Adobe Photoshop CS4, Version 11.0.2 to assemble the columns (Microsoft Excel for Mac 2011, Version 14.4.8) and the map (intern map by the ICPR Secretariat, 2011; modified).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Typical microplastic categories in the Rhine.
Left: Duisburg sample consisting of 65% opaque spherules, further fragments and fibres, bar: 2 mm. (a/b) transparent spherules with gas bubbles, polymethyl-methacrylate (Zuilichem), bars: 1 mm; (c/d) opaque spherules, polystyrene (Duisburg, Rees), bars: 500 μm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kershaw P. J. Sources, Fate and Effects of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Global Assessment. Rep. Stud. GESAMP. 90, 96 p. (2015).
    1. Cole M., Lindeque P., Fileman E., Halsband C. & Galloway T. S. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1130–1137 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Von Moos N., Burkhardt-Holm P. & Köhler A. Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 11327–11335 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Farrell P. & Nelson K. Trophic level transfer of microplastic: Mytilus edulis (L.) to Carcinus maenas (L.). Environ. Poll. 117, 1–3 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Eerkes-Medrano D., Thompson R. C. & Aldridge D. C. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res. 75, 63–82 (2015). - PubMed

Publication types