A standardized protocol for identifying and counting lymph nodes harvested by pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy
- PMID: 26644808
- PMCID: PMC4662397
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2796
A standardized protocol for identifying and counting lymph nodes harvested by pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy
Abstract
Introduction: Lymph node counts have become a surrogate measure for the extent and quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical cystectomy, but little consideration has been given to the methodology of lymph node processing. We report results from a prospective series comparing a conventional protocol for processing PLND specimens to a fat-emulsifying protocol. We hypothesized that the rate of node positivity would increase with the fat-emulsifying protocol.
Methods: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for cTis-T4aN0-1M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were eligible for this trial. Palpable lymph nodes were isolated from the PLND specimens in the conventional protocol. The remaining tissue was then processed with fat-emulsifying solution to identify further nodes visually. Nodal counts were compared between techniques.
Results: The median number of nodes counted in the PLND specimens of 26 patients was 24.5 (range: 20-40) with conventional processing and 37 (range: 24-52) with the fat-emulsifying solution (p < 0.001). Three patients had lymph node positive disease detected by conventional means, and a single patient was found to have a single positive node by the fat-emulsifying solution alone. The study was closed early after conducting a futility analysis.
Conclusions: A fat-emulsifying protocol identified more lymph nodes than a conventional protocol and may be an appropriate method to standardize lymph node processing following PLND. However, we were unable to show that such a standardized approach significantly increased the rate of node positivity in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Figures









Similar articles
-
Effect of a minimum lymph node policy in radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy on lymph node yields, lymph node positivity rates, lymph node density, and survivorship in patients with bladder cancer.Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):1901-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25011. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20186823
-
Lymph node yield in node-negative patients predicts cancer specific survival following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma.Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):416-422. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.416. Epub 2017 Oct 23. Investig Clin Urol. 2017. PMID: 29124240 Free PMC article.
-
Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping.J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1286-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000137817.56888.d1. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15371825
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Nov;15(11):686-692. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0066-1. Nat Rev Urol. 2018. PMID: 30104615 Review.
-
The Adequacy of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy During Radical Cystectomy for Carcinoma Urinary Bladder: A Narrative Review of Literature.Front Surg. 2021 Jun 17;8:687636. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.687636. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34222323 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Radical cystectomy: a review of techniques, developments and controversies.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3073-3081. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.23. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 33457280 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, et al. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: A collaborative group report. J Urol. 2004;171:1823–8. discussion 1827–8. - PubMed
-
- Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K. Radical cystectomy: Extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. J Urol. 1998;160:2015–9. discussion 2020. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources