Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):337-42.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2796.

A standardized protocol for identifying and counting lymph nodes harvested by pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy

Affiliations

A standardized protocol for identifying and counting lymph nodes harvested by pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy

Michael J Metcalfe et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Lymph node counts have become a surrogate measure for the extent and quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical cystectomy, but little consideration has been given to the methodology of lymph node processing. We report results from a prospective series comparing a conventional protocol for processing PLND specimens to a fat-emulsifying protocol. We hypothesized that the rate of node positivity would increase with the fat-emulsifying protocol.

Methods: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for cTis-T4aN0-1M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were eligible for this trial. Palpable lymph nodes were isolated from the PLND specimens in the conventional protocol. The remaining tissue was then processed with fat-emulsifying solution to identify further nodes visually. Nodal counts were compared between techniques.

Results: The median number of nodes counted in the PLND specimens of 26 patients was 24.5 (range: 20-40) with conventional processing and 37 (range: 24-52) with the fat-emulsifying solution (p < 0.001). Three patients had lymph node positive disease detected by conventional means, and a single patient was found to have a single positive node by the fat-emulsifying solution alone. The study was closed early after conducting a futility analysis.

Conclusions: A fat-emulsifying protocol identified more lymph nodes than a conventional protocol and may be an appropriate method to standardize lymph node processing following PLND. However, we were unable to show that such a standardized approach significantly increased the rate of node positivity in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Patient 1: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Patient 2: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Patient 3: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Patient 4: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Patient 5: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Patient 6: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Patient 7: Photo of right and left extended lymph node dissection demonstrating complete removal of lymph node tissue up to the bifurcation of the aorta.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Distribution of node counts.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Pelvic lymph node specimen after radical cystectomy and extended lymph node dissection in a patient with BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) refractory disease. This lymph node has been exposed to the fat-emulsifying protocol. Surrounding the lymph node the excess fat and areolar tissue has been dissolved away, bringing the lymph node tissue to the foreground. The metastatic deposit within this lymph node was 5 × 2 mm, occupying most of the node without evidence of extra-nodal extension.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, et al. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: A collaborative group report. J Urol. 2004;171:1823–8. discussion 1827–8. - PubMed
    1. Malkowicz SB, van Poppel H, Mickisch G, et al. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urology. 2007;69:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karl A, Carroll PR, Gschwend JE, et al. The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;55:826–35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leissner J, Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H, et al. Extended radical lymphadenectomy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer: Results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2004;171:139–144. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000102302.26806.fb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K. Radical cystectomy: Extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. J Urol. 1998;160:2015–9. discussion 2020. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources