Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Apr;157(4):777-785.
doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000434.

Effectiveness of psychological interventions for chronic pain on health care use and work absence: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of psychological interventions for chronic pain on health care use and work absence: systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrew Pike et al. Pain. 2016 Apr.

Erratum in

Abstract

Psychological interventions for chronic pain and its consequences have been shown to improve mood, disability, pain, and catastrophic thinking, but there has been no systematic review specifically of their effects on health care use or time lost from work as treatment outcomes in mixed chronic pain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies for chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults for these outcomes. We used searches from 2 previous systematic reviews and updated them. Eighteen randomized controlled trials were found that reported health care use (15 studies) and work loss (9 studies) as outcomes. Fourteen studies provided data for meta-analysis. There were moderate effects for psychological interventions compared with active controls, treatment as usual and waiting list controls in reducing health care use, with confidence in the findings. No benefits were found for medication reduction, but with less confidence in this result. Analysis of work loss showed no significant effects of psychological interventions over comparisons, but the use of many different metrics necessitated fragmenting the planned analyses, making summary difficult. The results are encouraging for the potential of routine psychological intervention to reduce posttreatment health care use, with associated cost savings, but it is likely that the range and complexity of problems affecting work necessitate additional intervention over standard group psychological intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams JH, Williams AC. What affects return to work for graduates of a pain management programme with chronic upper limb pain? J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:91–106.
    1. Alaranta H, Rytökoski U, Rissanen A, Talo S, Rönnemaa T, Puukka P, Karppi SL, Videman T, Kallio V, Slätis P. Intensive physical and psychosocial training program for patients with chronic low back pain; a controlled clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1339–49.
    1. Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, Mendonça L, Dias CC, Castro-Lopes JM. Chronic pain and health services utilization. Med Care 2013;51:859–69.
    1. Ballantyne JC. Assessing the prevalence of opioid misuse, abuse and addiction in chronic pain. PAIN 2015;156:567–8.
    1. Beale M, Cella M, Williams AC. Comparing patients' and clinician-researchers' outcome choice for psychological treatment of chronic pain. PAIN 2011;152:2283–6.

LinkOut - more resources