American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision
- PMID: 2664697
American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision
Erratum in
- Pediatrics 1989 Nov;84(5):761
Abstract
Properly performed newborn circumcision prevents phimosis, paraphimosis, and balanoposthitis and has been shown to decrease the incidence of cancer of the penis among US men. It may result in a decreased incidence of urinary tract infection. However, in the absence of well-designed prospective studies, conclusions regarding the relationship of urinary tract infection to circumcision are tentative. An increased incidence of cancer of the cervix has been found in sexual partners of uncircumcised men infected with human papillomavirus. Evidence concerning the association of sexually transmitted diseases and circumcision is conflicting. Newborn circumcision is a rapid and generally safe procedure when performed by an experienced operator. It is an elective procedure to be performed only if an infant is stable and healthy. Infants respond to the procedure with transient behavioral and physiologic changes. Local anesthesia (dorsal penile nerve block) may reduce the observed physiologic response to newborn circumcision. It also has its own inherent risks. However, reports of extensive experience or follow-up with the technique in newborns are lacking. Newborn circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages as well as disadvantages and risks. When circumcision is being considered, the benefits and risks should be explained to the parents and informed consent obtained.
Comment in
-
Circumcision.Pediatrics. 1990 May;85(5):888-9. Pediatrics. 1990. PMID: 2330254 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Male circumcision.Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22926175
-
Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):769-80. CMAJ. 1996. PMID: 8634956 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Circumcision of pacific boys: tradition at the cutting edge.Pac Health Dialog. 2006 Sep;13(2):115-22. Pac Health Dialog. 2006. PMID: 18181400 Review.
-
Circumcision policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Circumcision.Pediatrics. 1999 Mar;103(3):686-93. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 10049981
-
Neonatal circumcision.Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;22(1):57-65. Urol Clin North Am. 1995. PMID: 7855960 Review.
Cited by
-
Urologic Diseases in Korean Military Population: a 6-year Epidemiological Review of Medical Records.J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):135-142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.1.135. J Korean Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 27914143 Free PMC article.
-
Circumcision without tears.CMAJ. 1996 Sep 1;155(5):507; author reply 508-9. CMAJ. 1996. PMID: 8804251 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Traditional circumcision during manhood initiation rituals in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a pre-post intervention evaluation.BMC Public Health. 2008 Feb 19;8:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-64. BMC Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18284673 Free PMC article.
-
Circumcised hypospadias.Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Jan;25(1):53-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2254-1. Epub 2008 Oct 11. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009. PMID: 18850103
-
Bleeding complications after ritual circumcision: about six children.Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;169(3):359-62. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1021-1. Epub 2009 Jul 9. Eur J Pediatr. 2010. PMID: 19585146
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical