Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;9(1):e14.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper

Affiliations

Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper

Stephanie Sivell et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To present and discuss the views of researchers at an academic palliative care research centre on research encounters with terminally ill patients in the home setting and to generate a list of recommendations for qualitative researchers working in palliative and end-of-life care.

Methods: Eight researchers took part in a consensus meeting to discuss their experiences of undertaking qualitative interviews. The researchers were of varying backgrounds and all reported having experience in interviewing terminally ill patients, and all but one had experience of interviewing patients in their home environment.

Results: The main areas discussed by researchers included: whether participation in end-of-life research unintentionally becomes a therapeutic experience or an ethical concern; power relationships between terminally ill patients and researchers; researcher reflexivity and reciprocity; researchers' training needs. Qualitative methods can complement the home environment; however, it can raise ethical and practical challenges, which can be more acute in the case of research undertaken with palliative and patients at the end-of-life.

Conclusions: The ethical and practical challenges researchers face in this context has the potential to place both participant and researcher at risk for their physical and psychological well-being. We present a set of recommendations for researchers to consider prior to embarking on qualitative research in this context and advocate researchers in this field carefully consider the issues presented on a study-by-study basis.

Keywords: Interviewing in the home; Methodological research; Palliative care; Qualitative Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Addington-Hall J. Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care 2002;11:220–4. 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00343.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. McClement SE, Woodgate RL. Research with families in palliative care: conceptual and methodological challenges. Eur J Cancer Care 1998;7:247–54. 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1998.00108.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koenig BA, Back AI, Crawley LM. Qualitative methods in end-of-life research: recommendations to enhance the protection of human subjects. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;25:S43–52. 10.1016/S0885-3924(03)00060-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whiting LS, Vickers PS. Conducting qualitative research with palliative care patients: applying Hammick's research ethics wheel. Int J Palliat Nurs 2010;16:58–68. 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.2.46751 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Kristjanson L. Human research ethics committees: issues in palliative care research. Int J Palliat Nurs 2003;9:13–18. 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.1.11040 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources