Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;36(6):433-9.
doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000345.

Assessing Variability and Implementation Fidelity of Suicide Prevention Safety Planning in a Regional VA Healthcare System

Jennifer M Gamarra  1   2   3 , Matthew T Luciano  1   4 , Jaimie L Gradus  1   2   5 , Shannon Wiltsey Stirman  1   2   6
Affiliations

Assessing Variability and Implementation Fidelity of Suicide Prevention Safety Planning in a Regional VA Healthcare System

Jennifer M Gamarra et al. Crisis. 2015.

Abstract

Background: In 2008, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the use of safety planning for suicide prevention. A safety plan is a list of strategies, developed collaboratively with a provider, for a patient to use when suicide risk is elevated. Despite the use of safety plans in VHA, little is known about implementation fidelity, the extent to which safety plans are delivered as intended, or patient-level outcomes of safety planning.

Aims: This study aimed to explore the implementation fidelity of safety planning in a regional VHA hospital and examine the associations between safety plan quality and completeness with patient outcomes.

Method: A comprehensive chart review was conducted for patients who were flagged as high risk for suicide (N = 200). Completeness and quality were coded, as well as information about patient and provider interactions regarding safety plan use.

Results: Safety plans were mostly complete and of moderate quality, although variability existed, particularly in quality. Limited evidence of follow-up regarding safety planning was found in the medical charts. Higher quality was associated with fewer subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations.

Conclusion: Variability in implementation fidelity and infrequent follow-up suggest a need for additional training and support regarding the use of safety plans for suicide prevention.

Keywords: fidelity; safety plan; suicide; veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation science. 2007;2(40):1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drew BL. Self-harm behavior and no-suicide contracting in psychiatric inpatient settings. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2001;15(3):99–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apnu.2001.23748. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feeley M, DeRubeis RJ, Gelfand LA. The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999;67(4):578. - PubMed
    1. Goin M. The “suicide-prevention contract”: A dangerous myth. Psychiatric News. 2003;38(14):3.
    1. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, Beautrais A, Currier D, Haas A, Hendin H. Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;294(16):2064–2074. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.16.2064. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types