Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;10(3):442-4.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54054. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and resection of rectum performed together: first experience

Affiliations

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and resection of rectum performed together: first experience

Milos Brodak et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopy is an increasingly used approach in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer and prostate cancer. The anatomical proximity of the two organs is the main reason to consider performing both procedures simultaneously.

Aim: To present our first experience of laparoscopic rectal resection and radical prostatectomy, performed simultaneously, in 3 patients.

Material and methods: The first patient was diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer and tumor infiltration of the prostate and seminal vesicles. The other 2 patients were diagnosed with tumor duplicity. The surgery of the first patient started with laparoscopic prostatectomy except division of the prostate from the rectal wall. The next step was resection of the rectum, extralevator amputation of the rectum and vesicourethral anastomosis. In the other patients, resection of the rectum, followed by radical prostatectomy, was performed.

Results: The median follow-up was 12 months. The median operation time was 4 h 40 min, with blood loss of 300 ml. The operations and postoperative course were without incident in the case of 2 patients. However, 1 patient had stercoral peritonitis and a vesicorectal fistula in the early postoperative stage. Sigmoidostomy and postponed ureteroileal conduit were carried out. All patients were in oncologic remission.

Conclusions: Combined laparoscopic rectal resection and radical prostatectomy is a viable option for selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or tumor duplication. The procedures were completed without complications in 2 out of 3 patients.

Keywords: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer; stercoral peritonitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Wirth MD, Brandt HM, Dolinger H, et al. Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening. Colorectal Cancer. 2014;3:253–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Müller S, Grønning LE, Nilsen FS, Mygland V. Robotic and minimal access surgery: technology and surgical outcomes of radicalprostatectomy for prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014;30:1–5. - PubMed
    1. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology. 2013;14:210–8. - PubMed
    1. Orhalmi J, Klos K, Jackanin S, Holéczy P. Intersphincteric resection of the rectum. Rozhl Chir. 2012;91:101–4. - PubMed
    1. Hu JC, Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. Eur Urol. 2014;66:666–72. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources