General practitioners' attitudes toward follow-up after cancer treatment: A cross-sectional questionnaire study
- PMID: 26649452
- PMCID: PMC4750731
- DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1118836
General practitioners' attitudes toward follow-up after cancer treatment: A cross-sectional questionnaire study
Abstract
Objective: An increasing number of cancer patients place a significant workload on hospital outpatient clinics, and health authorities are considering alternative follow-up regimens. It has been suggested that follow-up of cancer patients could be provided by GPs. This study aimed to explore GPs' experiences with the provision of follow-up care for cancer patients, and their views on assuming greater responsibility in the future.
Design: Electronic questionnaire study.
Subjects: GPs in seven regions in Norway.
Results: A total of 317 GPs responded. Many GPs reported experience in providing follow-up care to cancer patients, during the years following initial diagnosis primarily in collaboration with hospital specialists. More than half of the GPs were satisfied with their collaboration. Most GPs preferred to be involved at an early stage in follow-up care and, generally, GPs felt confident in their skills to provide this type of service. Fewer than 10% were willing to assume responsibility for additional cancer patients, citing potentially increased workload as the main reason.
Conclusions: GPs acknowledged the importance of providing follow-up care to cancer patients, and the majority felt confident in their own ability to provide such care. However, they were hesitant to assume greater responsibility primarily due to fears of increased workload. Key Points It has been suggested that follow-up of cancer patients can be provided by general practitioners (GPs). The viewpoints and attitudes of GPs regarding such follow-up were investigated. GPs reported broad experience in providing follow-up care to patients after active cancer treatment. GPs acknowledged the importance of follow-up care, and they felt confident in their own ability to provide such care. Fewer than 10% of GPs were willing to assume responsibility for additional cancer patients, citing potentially increased workload as the main reason.
Keywords: Attitudes; Norway; cancer patients; cancer survivors; follow-up care; general practice; primary care physician.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Toward shared care for people with cancer: developing the model with patients and GPs.Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):554-64. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr012. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21467132
-
Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):420-427. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249059. Epub 2016 Nov 8. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016. PMID: 27822976 Free PMC article.
-
Discharge of breast cancer patients to primary care at the end of hospital follow-up: a cross-sectional survey.Eur J Cancer. 2013 May;49(8):1836-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Feb 28. Eur J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23453936
-
Evaluating primary care follow-up of breast cancer: methods and preliminary results of three studies.Ann Oncol. 1995;6 Suppl 2:47-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/6.suppl_2.s47. Ann Oncol. 1995. PMID: 8547197 Review.
-
The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;11(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.212. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24247164 Review.
Cited by
-
Return to Work of Cancer Survivors: Predicting Healthcare Professionals' Assumed Role Responsibility.J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9807-5. J Occup Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 30120666
-
Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06993-0. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32487036 Free PMC article.
-
Late-effect awareness and follow-up of cancer in general practice.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Sep;40(3):360-369. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139457. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022. PMID: 36380478 Free PMC article.
-
A Shared Cancer Follow-Up Model of Care Between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Patients With Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e21752. doi: 10.2196/21752. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 33464209 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e055460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36038175 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cancer in Norway 2012. Oslo: Kreftregisteret; 2014.
-
- Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S.. Primary care physiciansʼ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3338–45. - PubMed
-
- Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: A comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:848–55. - PubMed
-
- Vistad I, Moy BW, Salvesen HB, Liavaag AH.. Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer: Time for a change? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:707–18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources