Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;33(4):223-32.
doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1118836. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

General practitioners' attitudes toward follow-up after cancer treatment: A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Affiliations

General practitioners' attitudes toward follow-up after cancer treatment: A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Heidi Lidal Fidjeland et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015.

Abstract

Objective: An increasing number of cancer patients place a significant workload on hospital outpatient clinics, and health authorities are considering alternative follow-up regimens. It has been suggested that follow-up of cancer patients could be provided by GPs. This study aimed to explore GPs' experiences with the provision of follow-up care for cancer patients, and their views on assuming greater responsibility in the future.

Design: Electronic questionnaire study.

Subjects: GPs in seven regions in Norway.

Results: A total of 317 GPs responded. Many GPs reported experience in providing follow-up care to cancer patients, during the years following initial diagnosis primarily in collaboration with hospital specialists. More than half of the GPs were satisfied with their collaboration. Most GPs preferred to be involved at an early stage in follow-up care and, generally, GPs felt confident in their skills to provide this type of service. Fewer than 10% were willing to assume responsibility for additional cancer patients, citing potentially increased workload as the main reason.

Conclusions: GPs acknowledged the importance of providing follow-up care to cancer patients, and the majority felt confident in their own ability to provide such care. However, they were hesitant to assume greater responsibility primarily due to fears of increased workload. Key Points It has been suggested that follow-up of cancer patients can be provided by general practitioners (GPs). The viewpoints and attitudes of GPs regarding such follow-up were investigated. GPs reported broad experience in providing follow-up care to patients after active cancer treatment. GPs acknowledged the importance of follow-up care, and they felt confident in their own ability to provide such care. Fewer than 10% of GPs were willing to assume responsibility for additional cancer patients, citing potentially increased workload as the main reason.

Keywords: Attitudes; Norway; cancer patients; cancer survivors; follow-up care; general practice; primary care physician.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Challenges of collaboration between GPs and hospital specialists.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
General practitioners’ views on the main purpose of follow-up care for cancer patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer in Norway 2012. Oslo: Kreftregisteret; 2014.
    1. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S.. Primary care physiciansʼ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3338–45. - PubMed
    1. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: A comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:848–55. - PubMed
    1. Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H.. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me”: The role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vistad I, Moy BW, Salvesen HB, Liavaag AH.. Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer: Time for a change? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:707–18. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources