Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 10:15:32.
doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0070-y.

Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice

Yvonne Zurynski  1   2 , Premala Sureshkumar  3   4 , Amy Phu  5   6 , Elizabeth Elliott  7   8   9
Affiliations

Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice

Yvonne Zurynski et al. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. .

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 100-140 million girls and women have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C). FGM/C is an ancient cultural practice prevalent in 26 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. With increased immigration, health professionals in high income countries including UK, Europe, North America and Australia care for women and girls with FGM/C. FGM/C is relevant to paediatric practice as it is usually performed in children, however, health professionals' knowledge, clinical practice, and attitudes to FGM/C have not been systematically described. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to address this gap.

Methods: The review was conducted according to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015015540, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). Articles published in English 2000-2014 which used quantitative methods were reviewed.

Results: Of 159 unique articles, 18 met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was poor - six studies met seven of the eight quality criteria. Study participants included mainly obstetricians, gynaecologists and midwives (15 studies). We found no papers that studied paediatricians specifically, but two papers reported on subgroups of paediatricians within a mixed sample of health professionals. The 18 articles covered 13 different countries: eight from Africa and 10 from high income countries. Most health professionals were aware of the practice of FGM/C, but few correctly identified the four FGM/C categories defined by WHO. Knowledge about FGM/C legislation varied: 25% of professionals in a Sudanese study, 46 % of Belgian labour ward staff and 94 % of health professionals from the UK knew that FGM/C was illegal in their country. Health professionals from high income countries had cared for women or girls with FGM/C. The need to report children with FGM/C, or at risk of FGM/C, to child protection authorities was mentioned by only two studies.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to determine health professionals' attitudes, knowledge and practice to support the development of educational materials and policy to raise awareness and to prevent this harmful practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification and selection of studies for review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. WHO. Eliminating female genital mutilation: the imperative 2008. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241596442_eng.pdf (Accessed May 2015)
    1. UNCIEF. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change.: UNICEF; 2013. ISBN 978-92-806-4703-7]. Available from: http://www.childinfo.org/files/FGCM_Lo_res.pdf. (Accessed May 2015)
    1. WHO. Global Strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNHCR, UNIFEM, WHO, FIGO, ICN, IOM, WCPT, WMA, MWIA. 2010; WHO/RHR/10.9. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/rhr_10_9/en/ (Accessed May 2015)
    1. Matthews B. Female genital mutilation: Australian law, policy and practical challenges for doctors. Med J Aust. 2011;194(3):139–41. - PubMed
    1. Multi-Agency Practice Guidelines: Female Genital Mutilation. HM Government, 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (Accessed February 2015)

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources