Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment
- PMID: 26653864
- DOI: 10.1037/bul0000038
Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment
Erratum in
-
"Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment": Correction.Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;144(4):393. doi: 10.1037/bul0000149. Psychol Bull. 2018. PMID: 29595300
Abstract
Twenty years ago, meta-analytic results (k = 19) confirmed the association between caregiver attachment representations and child-caregiver attachment (Van IJzendoorn, 1995). A test of caregiver sensitivity as the mechanism behind this intergenerational transmission showed an intriguing "transmission gap." Since then, the intergenerational transmission of attachment and the transmission gap have been studied extensively, and now extend to diverse populations from all over the globe. Two decades later, the current review revisited the effect sizes of intergenerational transmission, the heterogeneity of the transmission effects, and the size of the transmission gap. Analyses were carried out with a total of 95 samples (total N = 4,819). All analyses confirmed intergenerational transmission of attachment, with larger effect sizes for secure-autonomous transmission (r = .31) than for unresolved transmission (r = .21), albeit with significantly smaller effect sizes than 2 decades earlier (r = .47 and r = .31, respectively). Effect sizes were moderated by risk status of the sample, biological relatedness of child-caregiver dyads, and age of the children. Multivariate moderator analyses showed that unpublished and more recent studies had smaller effect sizes than published and older studies. Path analyses showed that the transmission could not be fully explained by caregiver sensitivity, with more recent studies narrowing but not bridging the "transmission gap." Implications for attachment theory as well as future directions for research are discussed.
(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Comment in
-
Rethinking the transmission gap: What behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology mean for attachment theory: A comment on Verhage et al. (2016).Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):107-113. doi: 10.1037/bul0000066. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28004961
-
Failing the duck test: Reply to Barbaro, Boutwell, Barnes, and Shackelford (2017).Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):114-116. doi: 10.1037/bul0000083. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28004962
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous