Subcutaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoirs
- PMID: 26655994
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.027
Subcutaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoirs
Abstract
Objective: To review our experience with subcutaneous inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir insertion in a large, single-surgeon series.
Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective review of 1000 consecutive Coloplast Titan inflatable penile implant procedures carried out by a single high-volume surgeon. Eight patients underwent subcutaneous reservoir placement (SRP) and are the subject of this review.
Results: Eight of our last 1000 patients underwent SRP. SRP was only employed in patients with a thick subcutaneous abdominal fat layer, which would be capable of concealing the reservoir. Seven patients recovered uneventfully, and none reported a palpable or visible reservoir. One patient, who had 5 prior penile implant procedures, developed peri-prosthetic infection, and required complete device removal. Reservoir removal in this obese patient was facilitated by the device's subcutaneous location.
Conclusion: SRP is a viable option for carefully selected obese patients. We suggest that this approach only be utilized in those with high body mass index and a thick subcutaneous abdominal fat layer. In thinner patients, the reservoir will be visible and/or palpable; we do not recommend subcutaneous placement under those circumstances.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.Urology. 2016 Feb;88:95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.029. Urology. 2016. PMID: 26964786 No abstract available.
-
Author Reply.Urology. 2016 Feb;88:95-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.030. Urology. 2016. PMID: 26964787 No abstract available.
-
Re: Subcutaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoirs.J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):787-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 9. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27597078 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources