Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Dec;94(49):e2241.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002241.

The Value of U/S to Determine Priority for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Emergency Room

Affiliations
Observational Study

The Value of U/S to Determine Priority for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Emergency Room

Abd Elrazek Abd Elrazek et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec.

Erratum in

Abstract

In countries endemic for liver and GIT diseases, frequent emergency department (ED) patients contribute to a disproportionate number of visits consuming substantial amount of medical resources. One of the most frequent ED visits is patients who present with hypovolemic shock, abdominal pain, or confusion with or without signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The use of conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-U/S) may provide immediate and useful information on the presence of esophageal varices, gastrointestinal tumors, and other GIT abnormalities.The current study investigated the feasibility of using (2D-U/S) to predict the source of UGIB in ED and to determine patients' priority for UGE.Between February 2003 and March 2013, we retrospectively reviewed the profiles of 38,551 Egyptian patients, aged 2 to 75 years old, who presented with a history of GI/liver diseases and no alcohol consumption. We assessed the value of 2D-U/S technology in predicting the source of UGIB.Of 38,551 patients presenting to ED, 900 patients (2.3%), 534 male (59.3%) and 366 female (40.7%) developed UGIB. Analyzing results obtained from U/S examinations by data mining for emergent UGE were patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), splenomegaly, and ascites (42.6% incidence of UGIB), followed by LC and splenomegaly (14.6%), LC only (9.4%), and was only 0.5% who had no morbidity finding by 2D-U/S.Ultrasonographic instrumentation increases the feasibility of predictive emergency medicine. The area has recently not only gained a fresh impulse, but also a new set of complex problems that needs to be addressed in the emergency medicine setting according to each priority.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors confirm the following statements: The manuscript is a unique submission and is not being considered for publication by any other source in any medium. Further, the manuscript has not been published, in part or in full, in any form. That there has been no duplicate publication or submission elsewhere of any part of the work (excluding abstracts); That all authors have read and approved the report; and That there were no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest. The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Rates of UGIB-related diseases in males and females. M = male, F = female, UGIB = upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Incidence of ultrasound-detected peptic ulcer, gastritis, and lower end esophagitis in patients assorted by age groups.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Incidence of ultrasound detected gastrointestinal polyps, stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, portal hypertensive gastropathy, gastric varices, and esophageal varices in patients assorted by age groups.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Incidence of ultrasound-detected liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, hepatic focal lesion (HFL), and ascites in patients assorted by age groups.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Prediction of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) according to ability of conventional trans-abdominal 2D ultrasound to predict UGIBs.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Modified flow chart algorithm of sequential steps used by Rapid I, ver.4.6, to predict upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barkun AN, Bardou M, KuipersEJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152:101. - PubMed
    1. Crooks C, Card T, West J. Reductions in 28-day mortality following hospital admission for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastroenterol 2011; 141:62–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balderas V, Bhore R, Lara LF, et al. The hematocrit level in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: safety of endoscopy and outcomes. Am J Med 2011; 124:970–976. - PubMed
    1. Cappell MS, Friedel D. Initial management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: from initial evaluation up to gastrointestinal endoscopy. Med Clin North Am 2008; 92:491. - PubMed
    1. Abd Elrazek, et al. Endoscopic management of Dieulafoy's lesion using Isoamyl-2-cyanoacrylate. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2013; 5:417–419. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms