Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;48(2):176-82.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3470. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

Identification of focally amplified lineage-specific super-enhancers in human epithelial cancers

Affiliations

Identification of focally amplified lineage-specific super-enhancers in human epithelial cancers

Xiaoyang Zhang et al. Nat Genet. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Whole-genome analysis approaches are identifying recurrent cancer-associated somatic alterations in noncoding DNA regions. We combined somatic copy number analysis of 12 tumor types with tissue-specific epigenetic profiling to identify significant regions of focal amplification harboring super-enhancers. Copy number gains of noncoding regions harboring super-enhancers near KLF5, USP12, PARD6B and MYC are associated with overexpression of these cancer-related genes. We show that two distinct focal amplifications of super-enhancers 3' to MYC in lung adenocarcinoma (MYC-LASE) and endometrial carcinoma (MYC-ECSE) are physically associated with the MYC promoter and correlate with MYC overexpression. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated repression or deletion of a constituent enhancer within the MYC-LASE region led to significant reductions in the expression of MYC and its target genes and to the impairment of anchorage-independent and clonogenic growth, consistent with an oncogenic function. Our results suggest that genomic amplification of super-enhancers represents a common mechanism to activate cancer driver genes in multiple cancer types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Pan-cancer analysis identifying focally amplified super-enhancers
(a) Schematic flow chart of pan-cancer GISTIC analysis of 10,534 tumors from 29 tumor types identifying non-coding focal amplifications of super-enhancers. (b) List of non-coding focal amplification regions harboring super-enhancers. UCEC: uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, HNSC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma, CRC: colorectal carcinoma, LIHC: liver hepatocellular carcinoma, CESC: cervical squamous cell carcinoma, ESCA: esophageal carcinoma. (c) The focal amplification on chr13q identified in HNSC. ChIP-seq profile of H3K27ac and super-enhancer regions from the HNSC cell line BICR-31. Log2 transformed expression level (RPKM) of KLF5 in HNSC tumors with focal amplification of KLF5-HNSE alone (n = 14) and tumors without the amplification (n = 288). Box plot: Middle bar, median; lower and upper box limits, 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; whiskers, min and max. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (**) p≤0.01; (***) p≤0.001. (d) The focal amplification region on chr13q identified in CRC. ChIP-seq profile of H3K27ac and super-enhancer regions from colon crypt. Log2 transformed expression level (RPKM) of USP12 in CRC tumors with focal amplification of USP12-CCSE alone (n = 6) and tumors without the amplification (n = 127). (e) The focal amplification on chr20q identified in LIHC. ChIP-seq profile of H3K27ac and super-enhancer regions from the LIHC cell line HepG2. Log2 transformed expression level (RPKM) of PARD6B in LIHC tumors with focal amplification of PARD6B-LCSE alone (n = 7) and tumors without the amplification (n = 245).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Lineage-specific focal amplification of super-enhancers adjacent to the MYC gene
(a) Focal amplification peaks adjacent to MYC identified by GISTIC in lung adenocarcinoma (n = 11/515) and UCEC (n = 20/539). (b) Whole genome sequencing rearrangement analysis of two lung adenocarcinomas reveals tandem duplications, indicated by the curves. H3K27ac ChIP-seq profile and super-enhancer regions of the LUAD cell lines A549, NCI-H2009 and NCI-H358 (c) and the UCEC cell line Ishikawa (d) in the MYC region. (e) 3C interaction frequency ± SEM measured by chromosome conformation capture assays (n = 3) in A549 and Ishikawa cells. The 3C ‘anchor’ primer targets the MYC promoter region, while the 3C ‘bait’ primers target the non-coding regions 3′ to MYC. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (**) p≤0.01; (***) p≤0.001. (f) Left: Log2 transformed expression level (RPKM) of MYC in LUAD tumors with focal amplification of either MYC alone (n = 7) or MYC-LASE alone (n = 11) and tumors without these amplifications (n = 235). Right: UCEC tumors with focal amplification of either MYC alone (n = 10) or MYC-ECSE (n = 14) and tumors without these amplifications (n = 250). Box plot: Middle bar, median; lower and upper box limits, 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; whiskers, min and max. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (***) p≤0.001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The activity of the MYC-LASE is predominantly driven by the e3 constituent enhancer
(a) H3K27ac, p300 binding and DNase I hypersensitivity profiles in A549, NCI-H2009 and NCI-H358 cells reveal the constituent enhancers e1-e5 within the super-enhancer region. (b) Luciferase reporter assay (n = 3) measuring enhancer activity of e1-e5 in A549, NCI-H358 and NCI-H2009 lung adenocarcinoma cells. The pGL3 plasmid without the enhancer region (Empty) is used as a negative control. (Y-axis) Relative Luciferase units are normalized to Renilla signal ± SEM. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (**) p≤ p0.01; (***) p≤0.001. (c) Enhancer activity of a duplicated e3 enhancer (2×e3) ± SEM as measured by luciferase reporter assay (n = 3). The P-value is derived from a t-test; (***) p≤0.001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Identification of transcription factors required for the activity of the e3 enhancer
(a) Enhancer activity ± SEM of small fragments (a-f) of the e3 enhancer as assessed by luciferase reporter assays (n = 3) in A549 LUAD cells. The fragments c and d show comparable enhancer activity relative to the intact e3 enhancer, while other fragments show minimal enhancer activity. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (***) p≤0.001. (b) Transcription factor DNA recognition motifs are identified in the mini-e3 enhancer region that is defined by the c and d fragments overlap. (c) The luciferase reporter expression level ± SEM after deletion of individual transcription factor motif sequence in the e3 regions. The P-value is derived from a t-test (n = 3); (**) p≤0.01; (***) p≤0.001. (d) Luciferase reporter expression level ± SEM after silencing NFE2L2 or CEBPB by siRNA (n = 3). The P-value is derived from a t-test; (*) p≤0.05; (**) p≤0.01. (e) ChIP-seq profile of NFE2L2 and CEBPB in the e1–e5 enhancer regions in A549 cells.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. KRAB-dCas9 mediated repression of the e3 enhancer reveals MYC as a direct target
(a) Upper: the design of KRAB-dCas9 mediated repression of the e3 enhancer. Bottom: ChIP-seq of H3K27ac in NCI-H2009 cells with and without KRAB-dCas9 enhancer repression. p300 ChIP-seq profile in parental NCI-H2009 cells indicates the e3 enhancer region. sg-Empty: no sgRNA; sg-Control: sgRNA that is predicted to not recognize any genomic regions; sg-e3KRAB #1 and sg-e3KRAB #2: two separate sgRNAs recognizing the e3 enhancer region. (b) The expression level of MYC ± SEM as measured by quantitative PCR in NCI-H2009 cells with and without KRAB-dCas9 mediated repression of the e3 enhancer (n = 2). (c) GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data generated in NIC-H2009 cells with and without KRAB-dCas9 mediated e3 enhancer repression reveals that genes regulated by e3 repression are enriched in MYC target genes identified by previous studies. The cellular transformation efficiency ± SEM as measured by anchorage-independent growth (n = 3) (d) and the cellular proliferation rate ± SEM as measured by clonogenic assays (n = 3) (e) in NCI-H2009 cells with and without KRAB-dCas9 mediated repression of the e3 enhancer. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (*) p≤0.05; (**) p≤0.01; (***) p≤0.001.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated deletion of the e3 enhancer impairs the oncogenic effect of the e3 enhancer amplification
(a) Upper: design of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated deletion of the e3 enhancer. Primers used to validate the e3 enhancer deletion are indicated. Bottom: Gel pictures of PCR amplification of genomic DNA using primers outside and inside the e3 enhancer region. sg-Empty: no sgRNA; sg-Control: a pair of sgRNAs that are predicted to not recognize any genomic regions; sg-e3del #1 and sg-e3del #2: two separate pairs of sgRNAs recognizing boundaries of the e3 enhancer region. PCR products were cloned into individual vectors and sequenced. Sequencing results represent the deletions induced by sg-e3del #1 (b) and sg-e3del #2 (c). The expression level of MYC ± SEM as measured by quantitative PCR (n = 2) (d), the cellular transformation efficiency ± SEM as measured by anchorage-independent growth (n = 3) (e) and the cellular proliferation rate ± SEM as measured by clonogenic assays (n = 3) (f) in NCI-H2009 cells with and without CRISPR/Cas9 mediated deletion of the e3 enhancer. The P-value is derived from a t-test; (*) p≤0.05; (**) p≤0.01. (g) Schematic representation of genomic structural variants activating MYC expression in cancer.

References

    1. Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature. 2009;458:719–724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beroukhim R, et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature. 2010;463:899–905. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bignell GR, et al. Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature. 2010;463:893–898. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephens PJ, et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature. 2009;462:1005–1010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weir BA, et al. Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2007;450:893–898. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms