Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Dec 11;5(12):e009655.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009655.

To what extent are surgery and invasive procedures effective beyond a placebo response? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised, sham controlled trials

Wayne B Jonas  1 , Cindy Crawford  1 , Luana Colloca  2 , Ted J Kaptchuk  3 , Bruce Moseley  4 , Franklin G Miller  5 , Levente Kriston  6 , Klaus Linde  7 , Karin Meissner  8
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

To what extent are surgery and invasive procedures effective beyond a placebo response? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised, sham controlled trials

Wayne B Jonas et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the quantity and quality of randomised, sham-controlled studies of surgery and invasive procedures and estimate the treatment-specific and non-specific effects of those procedures.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), PILOTS, PsycInfo, DoD Biomedical Research, clinicaltrials.gov, NLM catalog and NIH Grantee Publications Database from their inception through January 2015.

Study selection: We included randomised controlled trials of surgery and invasive procedures that penetrated the skin or an orifice and had a parallel sham procedure for comparison.

Data extraction and analysis: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting continuous outcomes were pooled and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs was calculated using a random effects model for difference between true and sham groups.

Results: 55 studies (3574 patients) were identified meeting inclusion criteria; 39 provided sufficient data for inclusion in the main analysis (2902 patients). The overall SMD of the continuous primary outcome between treatment/sham-control groups was 0.34 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.49; p<0.00001; I(2)=67%). The SMD for surgery versus sham surgery was non-significant for pain-related conditions (n=15, SMD=0.13, p=0.08), marginally significant for studies on weight loss (n=10, SMD=0.52, p=0.05) and significant for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) studies (n=5, SMD=0.65, p<0.001) and for other conditions (n=8, SMD=0.44, p=0.004). Mean improvement in sham groups relative to active treatment was larger in pain-related conditions (78%) and obesity (71%) than in GERD (57%) and other conditions (57%), and was smaller in classical-surgery trials (21%) than in endoscopic trials (73%) and those using percutaneous procedures (64%).

Conclusions: The non-specific effects of surgery and other invasive procedures are generally large. Particularly in the field of pain-related conditions, more evidence from randomised placebo-controlled trials is needed to avoid continuation of ineffective treatments.

Keywords: COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE; INTERNAL MEDICINE; SURGERY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of included studies. RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The specific effect of invasive procedures and surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot using continuous outcomes (effects of active vs sham treatment) of the 39 studies included in the main meta-analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative contribution to improvement in the placebo and active treatment groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Friedly J, Standaert C, Chan L. Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010;21:659–77. 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.08.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am 2009;40:479–89, viii 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donnez J, Squifflet J, Donnez O. Minimally invasive gynecologic procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:289–95. 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Politis M, Lindvall O. Clinical application of stem cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. BMC Med 2012;10:1 10.1186/1741-7015-10-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosemurgy AS, Donn N, Paul H et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Clin North Am 2011;91:1015–29. 10.1016/j.suc.2011.06.004 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types