Gestational diabetes in Saudi women identified by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group versus the former American Diabetes Association criteria: a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 26657225
- PMCID: PMC6074466
- DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.428
Gestational diabetes in Saudi women identified by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group versus the former American Diabetes Association criteria: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Background and objectives: Use of the criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) identifies additional cases of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) that have a lesser degree of hyperglycemia. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and the pregnancy outcomes of GDM cases identified by IADPSG versus those identified by the former American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
Design and settings: Prospective cohort study of Saudi women conducted at the Maternity and Children Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia from October 2011 to August 2012.
Patients and methods: Consecutive pregnant women treated in the antenatal service performed oral glu.cose tolerance tests between 24 to 28 weeks of gestation. GDM was diagnosed according to IADPSG and the former ADA criteria. The women were divided into three groups by GDM diagnosed by both criteria, additional GDM identified by the IADPSG criteria, and cases with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared.
Results: Of 277 women who underwent OGTT, 47 (16.9%) were diagnosed by the former ADA criteria and 115 (41.5%) by the IADPSG criteria. The IADPSG criteria identified all women with GDM by the former ADA criteria and an additional 68 cases. The additional GDM cases had the same clinical characteristics as cases diagnosed by both criteria except for lower blood pressure and less frequent glycosuria. On the other hand, they were older, heavier and had a higher frequency of past GDM and history of recurrent abortions than the NGT group. In addition, they had significantly more cesarean deliveries, neonatal hypoglycemia, and a lower Apgar score than the NGT group.
Limitations: Relatively small numbers of subjects, which could limit the power of statistical findings.
Conclusions: The IADPSG criteria increased GDM frequency. The additional GDM cases identified by IADPSG have the same clinical characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes as cases with GDM identified by the older criteria.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has no conflict of interest.
References
-
- International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676–82. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovarindr U, Coustan D, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(19):1991–2002. - PubMed
-
- Jenum AK, Mørkrid K, Sletner L, Vangen S, Vange S, Torper JL, et al. Impact of ethnicity on gestational diabetes identified with the WHO and the modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Feb;166(2):317–24. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Reyes-Muñoz E, Parra A, Castillo-Mora A, Ortega-González C. Effect of the diagnostic criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in urban Mexican women: a cross-sectional study. Endocrine Practice. 2012;18(2):146–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
