Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications
- PMID: 26657316
- PMCID: PMC4709472
- DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2015.33
Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED), the second most common male sexual disorder, has an important impact on man sexuality and quality of life affecting also female partner's sexual life. ED is usually related to cardiovascular disease or is an iatrogenic cause of pelvic surgery. Many non-surgical treatments have been developed with results that are controversial, while surgical treatment has reached high levels of satisfaction. The aim is to evaluate outcomes and complications related to prosthesis implant in patients suffering from ED not responding to conventional medical therapy or reporting side effects with such a therapy. One hundred eighty Caucasian male suffering from ED were selected. The patient population were divided into two groups: 84 patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome (group A) and 96 patients with dysfunction following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (group B). All subjects underwent primary inflatable penile prosthesis implant with an infrapubic minimally invasive approach. During 12 months of follow-up, we reported 3 (1.67%) explants for infection, 1 (0.56%) urethral erosion, 1 (0.56%) prosthesis extrusion while no intraoperative complications were reported. Mean International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) was 8.2 ± 4.0 and after the surgery (12 months later) was 20.6 ± 2.7. The improvement after the implant is significant in both groups without a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P-value 0.65). Mean Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) score 1 year after the implant is 72.2 ± 20.7, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups A and B (P-value 0.55). Implantation of an inflatable prosthesis, for treatment of ED, is a safe and efficacious approach; and the patient and partner satisfaction is very high. Surgical technique should be minimally invasive and latest technology equipment should be implanted in order to decrease after surgery common complications (infection and mechanical failure).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: A new minimally invasive infrapubic surgical technique.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Jan 14;87(4):322-4. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.4.322. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016. PMID: 26766806
-
Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1167-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2249-z. Epub 2018 Feb 28. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29492584
-
Quality of Life, Psychological Functioning, and Treatment Satisfaction of Men Who Have Undergone Penile Prosthesis Surgery Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.J Sex Med. 2017 Dec;14(12):1612-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 27. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 29111200
-
Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.Andrology. 2024 Mar;12(3):624-632. doi: 10.1111/andr.13497. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Andrology. 2024. PMID: 37452742 Review.
-
Placement of Inflatable Penile Implants in Patients With Prior Radical Pelvic Surgery: A Literature Review.Sex Med Rev. 2019 Jan;7(1):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 30. Sex Med Rev. 2019. PMID: 30503795 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of the effects of different surgical approaches on corporotomy localization in inflatable penile implant surgery performed by expert implant surgeons.Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):539-543. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00593-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 35760888
-
Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation.Cureus. 2022 Jun 19;14(6):e26097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26097. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35875283 Free PMC article.
-
An update on oxidized regenerated cellulose (fibrillar™) in reducing postoperative corporal bleeding following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):43-49. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.05. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 32055465 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic.Int J Impot Res. 2016 Nov;28(6):205-208. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2016.23. Epub 2016 May 26. Int J Impot Res. 2016. PMID: 27225711
-
Non-ischemic priapism following recurrent idiopathic ischemic priapism treated successfully with selective arterial embolization and postoperative vacuum therapy before delayed inflatable penile prosthesis placement: A single case report.IJU Case Rep. 2018 Sep 20;1(1):13-15. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12019. eCollection 2018 Nov. IJU Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 32743355 Free PMC article.
References
-
- 2Porst H, Sharlip I. History and epidemiology of male sexual dysfunction. In: Porst H, Buval J eds. Standard Practice in Sexual Medicine. Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2006; 43–48.
-
- 3Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61. - PubMed
-
- 4Lee JC, Benard F, Carrier S, Talwar V, Defoy I. Do men with mild erectile dysfunction have the same risk factors as the general erectile dysfunction clinical trial population? BJU Int 2011; 107: 956–960. - PubMed
-
- 5Stanford JL, Feng Z, As Hamilton, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Eley JW et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000; 283: 354–360. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical