Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0141803.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141803. eCollection 2015.

Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews

Gemma Pearce  1 , Hilary Pinnock  2 , Eleni Epiphaniou  3 , Hannah L Parke  3 , Emily Heavey  4 , Christopher J Griffiths  3 , Trish Greenhalgh  5 , Aziz Sheikh  2 , Stephanie J C Taylor  3
Affiliations
Review

Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews

Gemma Pearce et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Supporting self-management in stroke patients improves psychological and functional outcomes but evidence on how to achieve this is sparse. We aimed to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews of qualitative studies in an overarching meta-review to inform the delivery and development of self-management support interventions.

Methods: We systematically searched eight electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL for qualitative systematic reviews (published January 1993 to June 2012). We included studies exploring patients', carers' or health care professionals' experiences relevant to self-management support following a stroke, including studies describing the lived experience of surviving a stroke. We meta-synthesised the included review findings using a meta-ethnographic framework.

Results: Seven reviews, reporting 130 unique studies, were included. Themes emerging from the reviews were pertinent, consistent and showed data saturation; though explicit mention of self-management support was rare. Our meta-review highlighted the devastating impact of stroke on patients' self-image; the varying needs for self-management support across the trajectory of recovery; the need for psychological and emotional support throughout recovery particularly when physical recovery plateaus; the considerable information needs of patients and carers which also vary across the trajectory of recovery; the importance of good patient-professional communication; the potential benefits of goal-setting and action-planning; and the need for social support which might be met by groups for stroke survivors.

Conclusions: The observed data saturation suggests that, currently, no further qualitative research simply describing the lived experience of stroke is needed; we propose that it would be more useful to focus on qualitative research informing self-management support interventions and their implementation. Our findings demonstrate both the on-going importance of self-management support and the evolving priorities throughout the stages of recovery following a stroke. The challenge now is to ensure these findings inform routine practice and the development of interventions to support self-management amongst stroke survivors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The four levels of collected data of which the meta-review is the fourth.
Fig 2
Fig 2. PRISMA flow chart for the meta-review and updated review results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Carandang R, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Kannel WB et al. Trends in incidence, lifetime risk, severity, and 30-day mortality of stroke over the past 50 years. JAMA 2006; 296: 2939–2946. - PubMed
    1. Wanless D, Britain G. Securing our future health: Taking a long-term view: an interim report. London: HM Treasury; 2001.
    1. Department of Health. Improving chronic disease management. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    1. Secretary of State for Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a New Direction for Community Services. London: Department of Health; 2006.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions. Washington, DC: US DHHS; 2010.

Publication types