Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jun;10(3):227-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination?

Graziella Bonetti et al. Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Glucose is one of the most frequently requested analytes in clinical laboratory. Blood glucose analysis is affected from in vitro glycolysis. In order to determine the most suitable blood collection tube for this purpose we have compared different tubes: sodium fluoride, lithium heparin, sodium fluoride/citrate buffer containing tubes and serum with clot activator tube for the measurement of glucose when the tube has been kept at room temperature (RT) for up to 4h.

Methods: Venous blood was collected from 49 healthy volunteers into Sarstedt S-Monovettes for glucose analysis. Reference plasma glucose was determined in a lithium heparin tube and immediately placed in an ice/water slurry. Within 10min it was centrifuged at 4°C and plasma was separated from the blood cells. Samples have been preserved at RT for 1, 2 and 4h after drawing. Glucose has been determined using a hexokinase method.

Results: Glucose levels tested in a serum with clot activator tube, in lithium heparin and in sodium fluoride/sodium EDTA tubes when compared with lithium-heparin reference plasma did not meet the desirable bias for glucose (±1.8%) when kept at RT for up to 4h. GlucoEXACT tubes, when corrected by the Sarsted recommended factor of 1.16, showed a mean (95% CI) bias of +0.96% (0.45-1.47) at 1h, +1.40% (0.88-1.93) at 2h and +0.95% (0.44-1.46) at 4h, reaching the analytical goal for the desirable bias.

Conclusions: Samples collected into GlucoEXACT tubes containing sodium fluoride/citrate buffer liquid mixture are equivalent to those collected in reference plasma tubes avoiding glycolysis completely and within a 4h delay in plasma separation.

Keywords: Citrate acidification; Glucose; Glycolysis inhibition; Hexokinase; Preanalytical conditions; Sodium fluoride; Stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources