Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb;36(2):95-9.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.130. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

A randomized controlled trial of differing doses of postcesarean enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in obese women

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of differing doses of postcesarean enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in obese women

M L Stephenson et al. J Perinatol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To compare two enoxaparin dosing strategies at achieving prophylactic anti-Xa levels in women with a body mass index (BMI) ⩾35 (kg m(-2)) postcesarean delivery.

Study design: Women with BMI ⩾35 were randomized to receive prophylactic enoxaparin at a fixed dose of 40 mg daily or weight-based dosing of 0.5 mg kg(-1) twice daily. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with peak anti-Xa levels in the prophylactic range of 0.2 to 0.6 IU ml(-1).

Result: From August 2013 through February 2014, 84 demographically similar women completed the protocol. In the weight-based group, 88% (37/42) of the women reached prophylactic anti-Xa levels versus 14% (6/42) in the fixed dose group (odds ratio 44.4, 95% confidence interval 12.44, 158.48, P<0.001). No anti-Xa level exceeded 0.48 IU ml(-1). There were no venous thromboembolic or bleeding events requiring reoperation or transfusion in either group.

Conclusion: Compared with fixed dosing daily, weight-based dosing twice daily more effectively achieved prophylactic anti-Xa levels without reaching the therapeutic range.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02070237.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Nov;22(4):280-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1307-15 - PubMed
    1. CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):36.e1-5; discussion 91-2. e7-11 - PubMed
    1. Br J Haematol. 2012 Feb;156(3):366-73 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data