Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;6(2):166-75.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0402. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

Whole Genome Sequencing Defines the Genetic Heterogeneity of Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Whole Genome Sequencing Defines the Genetic Heterogeneity of Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Nicholas J Roberts et al. Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2020. A familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer has been established, but the cause of this aggregation in most families is unknown. To determine the genetic basis of susceptibility in these families, we sequenced the germline genomes of 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and the tumor exomes of 39 familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Our analyses support the role of previously identified familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2, CDKN2A, and ATM, and identify novel candidate genes harboring rare, deleterious germline variants for further characterization. We also show how somatic point mutations that occur during hematopoiesis can affect the interpretation of genome-wide studies of hereditary traits. Our observations have important implications for the etiology of pancreatic cancer and for the identification of susceptibility genes in other common cancer types.

Significance: The genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of patients with familial pancreatic cancer is unknown. We whole genome sequenced 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and demonstrate that the genetic underpinning of inherited pancreatic cancer is highly heterogeneous. This has significant implications for the management of patients with familial pancreatic cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

STATEMENT ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Under a licensing agreement between Myriad Genetics, Inc., and the Johns Hopkins University, J.R.E, M.G., R.H.H., K.W.K., A.P.K., and B.V. are entitled to a share of royalty received by the University on sales of products related to PALB2. Under agreements between the Johns Hopkins University, Sysmex-Inostics, Personal Genome Diagnostics, PapGene, Exact Sciences, LabCorp, and QIAGEN, K.W.K., N.P., and B.V. are entitled to a share of the royalties received by the University on sales of products related to genes and technologies described in this manuscript. K.W.K., N.P., and B.V. are co-founders of Inostics and Personal Genome Diagnostics and are members of their Scientific Advisory Boards. They own stock in Sysmex-Inostics, Papgene, and Personal Genome Diagnostics, which is subject to certain restrictions under Johns Hopkins University policy. The terms of these arrangements are managed by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A. Overview of filter-based strategy to identify novel candidate familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes. 638 familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) patients from 593 kindreds. FPC patients were selected from 10 high-risk family registries in North America with diverse ascertainment screens including: internet recruitments, medical genetics clinics, and tertiary care facilities. Demographic and sample data for the 638 FPC patients is shown in Table 1. FPC patient samples were whole genome sequenced, aligned to the human genome build hg19 before variant calling and annotation. One FPC patient from each kindred was arbitrarily selected for filter-based analyses. All germline variants in selected FPC patients were identified and, depending on analysis, filtered by: 1) functional consequence of variant, 2) frequency of the variant in FPC patients and variant databases (the 1000 Genomes Project and EVS), 3) zygosity of variant, and 4) variant quality. The following analyses were then performed on filtered variants: 1) analysis of premature truncating variants (PTVs), 2) in-depth analysis of selected genes, and 3) analysis of variant segregation in affected members of a kindred. B. Distribution of private heterozygous PTVs in FPC patients selected for filter-based analyses. Blue bars indicate number of genes within each PTV category. Grey bars indictate cumulative number of genes.

References

    1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. 2015;2015:1–56. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2...
    1. Hruban RH, Zamboni G. Pancreatic cancer. Special issue--insights and controversies in pancreatic pathology. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2009;133:347–9. - PubMed
    1. Klein AP, Brune KA, Petersen GM, Goggins M, Tersmette AC, Offerhaus GJ, et al. Prospective risk of pancreatic cancer in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. Cancer research. 2004;64:2634–8. - PubMed
    1. Yuen RK, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Merico D, Walker S, Tammimies K, Hoang N, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of quartet families with autism spectrum disorder. Nature medicine. 2015;21:185–91. - PubMed
    1. Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley JW, Kamel I, et al. International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013;62:339–47. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts