Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 13:10.1007/7651_2015_303.
doi: 10.1007/7651_2015_303. Online ahead of print.

In Situ Sodium Bisulfite Modification of Genomic DNA from Microdissected Melanoma Paraffin-Embedded Archival Tissues

Affiliations

In Situ Sodium Bisulfite Modification of Genomic DNA from Microdissected Melanoma Paraffin-Embedded Archival Tissues

Diego M Marzese et al. Methods Mol Biol. .

Abstract

DNA methylation analysis of paraffin-embedded archival tumor tissues (PEAT) is important in clinical and translational research studies. Efficient identification and isolation of homogeneous cell population, optimal DNA extraction, and sodium bisulfite modification (SBM) are essential, particularly in small tumor lesions. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) coupled with an in situ SBM improves the specificity, through histopathology accuracy, and the amount of genomic DNA modified for downstream methylation assays.

Keywords: DNA methylation; Laser capture microdissection (LCM); Melanoma; Sodium bisulfite modification (SBM).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In situ-SBM algorithm. (a) Positioning of LCM-cap on tissue section. (b) Selection of cells of interest and pulse of infrared laser. (c) Separation of cells bounded to the LCM-cap polymer. Light micrographs show melanoma nested in heterogeneous tissue prior LCM (d), after LCM (e) and the LCM-cap containing the adhered targeted melanoma tissue sections (f). Black arrowheads indicate the targeted melanoma tissue. (g) Diagram of a microcentrifuge tube containing the LCM-cap with the isolated population of cells. (h) CFX manager 2.0 output view of the quantitative PCR amplification for methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) alleles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hahn WC, Weinberg RA. Rules for making human tumor cells. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1593–1603. - PubMed
    1. Sadikovic B, Al-Romaih K, Squire JA, et al. Cause and consequences of genetic and epigenetic alterations in human cancer. Curr Genomics. 2008;9(6):394–408. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenberg ES, Chong KK, Huynh KT, et al. Epigenetic biomarkers in skin cancer. Cancer Lett. 2012 [Epub Ahead of Print] - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Hoesel AQ, van de Velde CJ, Kuppen PJ, et al. Hypomethylation of LINE-1 in primary tumor has poor prognosis in young breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(3):1103–1114. - PubMed
    1. Lian CG, Xu Y, Ceol C, et al. Loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is an epigenetic hallmark of melanoma. Cell. 2012;150(6):1135–1146. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources