Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids
- PMID: 26661811
- DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889.0303.51
Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids
Abstract
In this tutorial, the characteristics of compression amplification in analog hearing aids and the experimental results obtained with single- and multichannel compression amplification systems are reviewed. Single-channel compression systems are classified into four broad groups on the basis of their static and dynamic characteristics: compression limiters, syllabic compressors, automatic volume control (AVC) systems, and "others," those with adaptive recovery time (aRT) and dual frontend automatic gain control (AGC) (Moore, 1990; Moore & Glasberg, 1988). Multichannel compression devices have, to date, used a variety of different types of compression, with syllabic compression in each frequency channel being the most popular. Experimental evidence suggests that compression limiting is generally superior to peak clipping as a means of controlling output, except for some individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. There is some evidence that syllabic compression and AVC systems enhance speech perception in quiet compared to conventional linear amplification; however, this improvement is not consistently maintained in the presence of background noise. The majority of recent research has focused on multichannel compression, and favorable results have been obtained with some systems. Research findings about the efficacy of using compression amplification for people with hearing loss have been extremely variable, and possible reasons for this are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.Otol Neurotol. 2013 Aug;34(6):1064-70. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb781. Otol Neurotol. 2013. PMID: 23856626
-
Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.Ear Hear. 1994 Feb;15(1):2-12. Ear Hear. 1994. PMID: 8194676 Review.
-
Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.Scand Audiol Suppl. 1993;38:67-74. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8153566
-
Compression systems for hearing aids and cochlear prostheses.J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986 Jan;23(1):25-39. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986. PMID: 3754282
-
How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids?Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;469:250-6. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990. PMID: 2192532 Review.
Cited by
-
Theoretical and practical considerations in compression hearing AIDS.Trends Amplif. 1996 Mar;1(1):5-39. doi: 10.1177/108471389600100102. Trends Amplif. 1996. PMID: 25425854 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.Trends Amplif. 2001 Mar;5(1):1-34. doi: 10.1177/108471380100500102. Trends Amplif. 2001. PMID: 25425895 Free PMC article.
-
The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-12. doi: 10.1177/1084713808317819. Trends Amplif. 2008. PMID: 18567591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.Trends Amplif. 2002 Dec;6(4):131-65. doi: 10.1177/108471380200600402. Trends Amplif. 2002. PMID: 25425919 Free PMC article.
-
Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?Trends Amplif. 1999 Jun;4(2):72-89. doi: 10.1177/108471389900400207. Trends Amplif. 1999. PMID: 25425890 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources