Vascular assessment techniques of podiatrists in Australia and New Zealand: a web-based survey
- PMID: 26664522
- PMCID: PMC4673851
- DOI: 10.1186/s13047-015-0130-5
Vascular assessment techniques of podiatrists in Australia and New Zealand: a web-based survey
Abstract
Background: Podiatrists play a central role in conducting non-invasive vascular assessment in the lower extremity. This involves screening for signs and symptoms of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and ongoing monitoring of the condition. Podiatric vascular assessment practices in Australia and New Zealand are currently unclear. Determining the clinical habits of Podiatrists is essential in identifying if there is a need for further education or support in performing accurate vascular assessments.
Methods: A web-based, secure, anonymous questionnaire was conducted of registered Podiatrists in Australia and New Zealand between 1 April and 31 July 2013. The questions examined clinician's regular practices in vascular assessment, clinical indicators to perform and barriers in completing vascular assessment. Nominal logistic regression was performed to further examine years of experience and practice setting on clinical indicators to perform vascular assessment and types of assessment performed.
Results: Four hundred forty-seven podiatrists participated in the survey. Clinical indicators for vascular assessment, along with barriers and available equipment were examined and the results varied depending on the podiatrists' geographical location, practice setting, and experience. Palpation of pedal pulses was the most frequently reported assessment (97 %) along with Doppler assessment (74 %). Pressure measurement was the least frequently reported vascular assessment method, with only 34 % undertaking ankle-brachial indices and 19 % completing toe-brachial indices. Public podiatrists reported more varied and complete vascular assessment compared to those in private practice. Lack of time was identified as the most frequently reported barrier (66 %) in performing vascular assessment, followed by lack of equipment (28 %). In New Zealand podiatrists, lack of equipment was much more of an issue than in Australian podiatrists.
Conclusion: Large variations exist in vascular assessment methods amongst Australian and New Zealand podiatrists. Some assessments being undertaken are potentially inadequate for accurate screening for PAD. There is a need for continuing education in vascular assessment to address the deficiencies in technique reported by some Podiatrists. A podiatry-relevant summary of broad international guidelines for PAD screening may be of use to improve utilisation and accuracy of screening methods to improve patient management.
Keywords: Clinical practice; Non-invasive vascular assessment; Podiatrist; Survey.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lower limb vascular assessment techniques of podiatrists in the United Kingdom: a national survey.J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 May 22;12:31. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0341-2. eCollection 2019. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019. PMID: 31139263 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of the ankle brachial index amongst podiatrists registered in Western Australia.J Foot Ankle Res. 2012 Jul 30;5(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-5-19. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012. PMID: 22846188 Free PMC article.
-
A survey of foot orthoses prescription habits amongst podiatrists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Nov 26;11:64. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0304-z. eCollection 2018. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018. PMID: 30505351 Free PMC article.
-
How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey.J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Apr 18;8:16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0072-y. eCollection 2015. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015. PMID: 25908944 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral arterial disease - screening in general practice.Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Jun;42(6):391-5. Aust Fam Physician. 2013. PMID: 23781546 Review.
Cited by
-
A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb.J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Dec 7;9:48. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0181-2. eCollection 2016. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016. PMID: 27980685 Free PMC article.
-
Toe-brachial index and toe systolic blood pressure for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 30;10(10):CD013783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013783.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39474992 Free PMC article.
-
What are the current diabetic foot assessment methods in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium: an exploratory mixed method study.J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Mar 27;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00615-1. J Foot Ankle Res. 2023. PMID: 36973800 Free PMC article.
-
The ankle brachial index in people with and without diabetes: intra-tester reliability.J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 May 12;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00389-w. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020. PMID: 32398142 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of ultrasound practice amongst podiatrists in the UK.J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 May 24;11:18. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0263-4. eCollection 2018. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018. PMID: 29849768 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic) J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(9):1383–98. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000240426.53079.46. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smieja M, Hunt D, Edelman D, Etchells E, Comuz J, Simel D. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research. Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(7):418–24. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05208.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cloete N, Kiely C, Colgan P, Haider N, O’Neill S, Madhavan P, et al. Reproducibility of toe pressure measurements. JVU. 2009;33(3):129–32.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous